Re: All things are full of gods

Paul S Person <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.books.inklings,alt.books,alt.mythology,alt.christnet.theology,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 07:58:46 +0200, Steve Hayes
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I've seen quite a lot of mentions on social media of a book with the
>title "All things are full of gods", so I looked it up on GoodReads,
>and found that no one had written a review of it there yet.
>
><https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/210129380-all-things-are-full-of-gods
>>
>
>Has anyone here read it?
>
>Any comments?
>
>I was quite intrigued by the title, which seems to be rather
>anti-modernity, because modernity maintains that all things are NOT
>full of gods. As one modernist theologian put it, some 60 years ago:
>
>Desacralization modernity.
>         Source: Cox, "The Secular City". 1965:36.
>    "We should oppose the romantic restoration of the sprites of
>  the forest. It may seem pleasant at first to reinstate the
>  leprechauns, but - as Hitler made all too clear - once the
>  Valkyries return, they will seek a bloodthirsty revenge on
>  those who banished them. We should also be wary of any attempt
>  to resacralize politics. Political leaders and movement should
>  never be granted any sacred significance, and all efforts to
>  use public authority to support traditional religious beliefs
>  or the quasi-religious beliefs of ideological secularism must
>  be resisted."
>
>I half agree.

That's more than I can say.

I read that in the early 70s. I thought (perhaps "imagined" would be
more accurate) that I understood it.

I re-read it a few years ago. I didn't understand it at all. I
disposed of it, probably in a metallic book donation bin.

So I can't say whether I agree or not, since the whole thing was
opaque to me.

>The supreme example of granting political leaders sacred significance
>was the ancient Roman religion of emperor worship, and similar cults
>of political leaders continue or are revived in modern times, and are
>to be deprecated.

There is a theory that this was done to provide all residents of the
Roman Empire with /one/ god they could /all/ acknowledge, thus
building a sense of unity. That's the problem with polytheistic
societies that are /very/ tolerant of other people's gods: no unifying
god.

>But when St Paul says our struggle is not against blood and flesh, but
>against the rulers, the authorities, the world powers of this present
>darkness (Eph 6:10-12) I believe he is saying that systemic evil is
>demonic. These demons have been given different names at different
>times.

That is a reasonable interpretation, although, AFAIK, the actual
context of his remarks is unknown -- presumably, there was a
philosophical or religious (and, since Paul was a Jew, probably
Jewish) position that posited rule of the world by, indeed, demons in
effect if not in name.

One of the books in /The Nag Hammadi Library in English/ is titled
"The Hypostasis of the Archons", which the translators translate in
their introduction as "The Reality of the Rulers", so I (at least)
wonder if Paul was into something that eventually produced Gnosticism.

>Back in the days of apartheid, here in South Africa we often just
>spoke of "the System", and in North America they spoke of "the
>military-industrial complex". 
>
>All things are full of gods, but not all gods are good, or
>well-disposed.
>
>Back in the secular sixties Western theologians were concerned to  
>demythologise the Christian faith. But there seems to be a rapidly
>growing field of scholarship that concerns itself mostly with those
>who in that period tried to remythologise it, such as the Inklings --
>J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams et al. Relatively little
>attention is paid nowadays to the demythologisers. 

I once rendered one of these guys speechless by pointing out that,
having demythologized the Christian faith of its ancient imagery, it
would then be necessary to re-mythologize it in modern imagery.

Apparently, he really /believed/ that his high-level sophisticated
intellectualism was free of all imagery but was a plain unvarnished
view of reality.

Well, in all fairness, Moses probably felt the same way when he came
down from the mountain. It is an easy delusion to slip into.
-- 
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.