Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

Anna <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jun 26 09:30:19 UTC
Newsgroups rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism,aus.religion.christian,alt.christnet
Organization Usenet.Farm
Message-ID <89ab0489-87f1-48dd-b458-58643f382ee1@y38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, theo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 3:01 am, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 4, 5:38 am, "Neosapienis" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I am not condemning him for reading the Bible as much as I am for coming to
> > > false conclusions and then purporting them to be true.
>
> > > Anyone who is opposed to human nudity in my book is either a fascist or a
> > > Nazi.
>
> > > --
>
> > > Best wishes,
>
> > > Dario Western
>
> > And should be killed, right?  That's what you said. You want someone
> > to put a bullet in that guy's head.
>
> I must have missed where he said that. Could you please point it out.
>
> Theo

"Public nudity is sin: Public nudity is sin and should evoke shame.
That some are not ashamed reveals more about their spiritual
deprivation than about whether public nudity is sin or not. Zephaniah
said, “…the unjust knows no shame” (Zephaniah 3:5). Public nudity is
humanity at the sensual level, and draws us away from God’s way and
elicits lust, jeopardizes marriage, and potentiates adultery,
fornication….."


In response Dario Said:

Somebody go to this preacher's place and put a bullet in his brain for
me,
hey?  I have never seduced anyone's spouse nor worshipped a pagan sex
God
with my nudism (which 'fornication' actually means).