Re: Looks like Justice Jackson will be writing lots of dissenting opinions
Turds eye view <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Oct 2022 21:30:29 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns,misc.legal,alt.circus.arts,alt.politics.correct,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03 Oct 2022, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]: > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justice-jackson-dives-into-supr > eme-court-divide-in-first-arguments/ar-AA12xWpi?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&c > vid=415b45323d594f4b8e5acadef2460ded > > That's good because Justices Sotomayor and Kagan need somebody to > share that workload with. Bet there's a lot of screaming and hollering going on between them. It's not all love of the lawbooks. That's not why they are there in the first place. Gender, ethnicity and mallebility is why they were chosen. Every single one of the three are influenced by media, hormones and emotion, not facts of law.