exm65.memo

 
 
 
 
 
 
             ((My comments in double parentheses - Homer))
 
                          MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE
 
                                EXM - 65
                             8 August 1992
 
         Copyright (C) 1992 A Voice of the Free Zone (Electra)
       Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
 
     'Are you denying the rightness of a marriage?'
     'Are you denying the wrongness of a marriage?'
     'Are you denying the rightness of a divorce?'
     'Are you denying the wrongness of a divorce?'
 
     You can't audit one side of a dichotomy with out auditing the
other.  If some guy is raving mad on the subject of marriage, either his
own or his parents or his children's, then audit him on the subject of
divorce.
 
     If he is mad on the subject of divorce, audit him on marriage.
 
     Marriage is a contract to produce children, a contract to create
and raise beings who can create and raise beings.
 
     Divorce is a cessation of that contract.
 
     Unfortunately, when you have a child, you have THEIR children too!
 
     You are not just creating one child. because your child can create
too.  When you create something that can create something, you are
responsible all the way up the line for the rest of time!
 
     Parents who wish to create just one child, usually make sure that
their children have no desire to marry or have children themselves.
 
     It can be done.
 
     Parents who take no joy in their children, bring up children that
soon learn that children are not a joy.  Thus they chose not to have
them.
 
     A child who could bring no joy to his parents, a child who had
parents that wanted to kill themselves even though he was there to make
them happy, soon learns that he is not a joy to have around.
 
     Thus all the emotions, all the goals and games that go with
'bringing joy to your parents' go by the wayside, and the child begins
to live in a gloom of grey and unfeeling sadness.
 
     If this happened to you as a child, did you do such a thing to YOUR
child many lives back?  Did something catch up with you?
 
     'Are you denying a wrongness?'
     'Are you denying a rightness?'
 
     'Are you charging people with crimes they did not commit?'
     'Are you refusing to charge people with crimes they did commit?'
 
     'Do you have a withhold on .......
 
     conception, birth, death, sex, marriage, divorce, having children,
being a fetus, being a baby, being a child, being a son, being a
daughter, being a mother, being a father, being a wife, being a husband,
being a girl, being a boy?'
 
     ((I would stick sister and brother in here along with grandstuff.
It's apparent to me that Electra never had brothers or sisters as she
almost never mentions them in her writings, yet many people have TONS of
charge on their siblings, especially the opposite sex siblings.))
 
     'Do you believe that you have never been a mother, a father, a
wife, a husband, a son, a daughter, a man, a woman, a boy or a girl?'
 
     'Have you ever married the wrong woman?'
     'Have you ever not married the right woman?'
 
     'Have you ever divorced a woman when you shouldn't have?'
     'Have you ever not divorced a woman when you should have?'
 
     'Have you ever broken your vows before God?'
     'Have you ever not broken your vows before the Devil?'
 
     'Have you ever made a vow you knew you could not keep?'
     'Have you ever made a vow you intended not to keep?'
 
     'Have you ever failed to responsibly create and raise children so
that they could responsibly create and raise children?'
 
     'Are you opposed to your parents having children?'
     'Are you opposed to having children?'
     'Are you opposed to your children having children?'
 
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a son?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a son?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a daughter?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a daughter?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a father?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a father?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a mother?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a mother?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a wife?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a wife?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a husband?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a husband?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a brother?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a brother?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a sister?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a sister?'
     'What don't you want to remember about being  a friend?'
     'What don't you want to remember about having a friend?'
 
     'What are you not willing to be again?'
     'What are you not willing to do again?'
     'What are you not willing to have again?'
 
     ((Running this without the 'again' is also important, as it may
never have happened before.
 
     It should be noted that these are ARC break processes.  It might be
more workable for some to audit the positive 'Tell me something you
would be willing to be (again.)'
 
     Also note the listing question format of these question, maybe for
cases below Grade III they should be reworded into non listing auditing
format.
 
     Apparently Electra didn't have much sympathy for people who
couldn't get the correct answer to a question (like me!), so much of her
work is in this listing format, which a lot of people have complained
about.  I myself rarely run this stuff with her exact wording, often
prefering something more vague like
 
     'Something on not willing to be again?'
     'Something you are not willing to be that you aren't telling me
about?'
     'Tell me something you are not willing to be.'
 
     Christ, there really is no hope for me, I am a Squirrel on a
Squirrel!))
 
     Electra

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Apr  8 12:06:01 EDT 2023 
FTP://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/electra/exm65.memo
WWW://www.clearing.org
BLOG://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
Send mail to [email protected] saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.