ral2.memo

According to Scientology 8-8008 NOTs is a limited procedure. It validates
negative aspects of case too much.  From observation people who run it too
long deteriorate.  But there is an appealing aspect to it in that its a
fairly simple procedure.  But there is perhaps a simple approach that
addresses NOTs without negating self.  One could hypothesize that the NOTs
case is pulled in as a substitute for lost beingness. 

Based on that hypothesis:

1. Locate a bt/cl/mass.
2. Pose the question: "What lost aspect  of my own beingness is that a
substitute for"?
3. Spot the time and place of the dissassociation/ separating of that
beingness from self.
4. Spot the beginning of the prior confusion to the separation.

I haven't tried it on anyone else yet.
Running it myself I find the bt vanishes without any address to its
case.

Anyone wanna be a guinea pig :-)


--

Ralph

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue May  2 00:06:02 EDT 2023 
FTP://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/ralph/ral2.memo
WWW://www.clearing.org
BLOG://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
Send mail to [email protected] saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.