overunder
Clearing Archive Roboposter <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | alt.clearing.technology |
|---|---|
| Organization | I SPEAK ONLY FOR MYSELF |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:34 PM 5/2/2002 -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote: >Robert D. ([email protected]) wrote: > >Are you talking about your case in PT? If so, have you tried Over/Under on > >the "glass, tar and amber"? > > Elucidate please. > > Homer "Get the concept (however vague, even if it's only "the idea of") of the terminal (in this case the "glass, tar and amber" or whatever is real to you). Put it above you. (ack) Put it below you. (ack) Put it to the right of you. (ack) Put it to the left of you. (ack) Put it in front of you. (ack) Put it in back of you. (ack) Put it above you. (ack) etc. etc. If for some reason you can't do this right away, you can always start by placing yourself in the opposite direction of the terminal, like to put it under you, you would place yourself above it. Itsa is invited from the Pc whenever it suits him. This process can be carried on for hours if necessary with TA action all along the way. The EP is typically a vanishment of the associated masses and a feeling of well being (along with F/N, cog, VGIs, of course). I've never seen this process to fail. If you would be interested in a free demo, I would be more than happy to oblige. It could be recorded if you would like (or not) and afterwards anybody could then take over the function of auditor. I have never seen it to fail to blow masses. It's the most powerful single process I've ever used. RD ================ http://www.clearing.org ==================== Wed Jun 21 18:06:02 EDT 2023 FTP://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/ducharme/overunder WWW://www.clearing.org BLOG://adoretheproof.blogspot.com Send mail to [email protected] saying help ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof =================== Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty. Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect. Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty. Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.