ndc1.memo
Clearing Archive Roboposter <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2023 18:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | alt.clearing.technology |
|---|---|
| Organization | I SPEAK ONLY FOR MYSELF |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Homer Wilson Smith wrote: > > > I will stick my neck out here and assert again that the Sandwich > > Process (available to all who like sandwiches) will get you back > > to core case smoothly and easily if you also use the techniques > > of Standard Tech 97 when appropriate. > > > > ndc > > Sometimes it is hard to take you seriously. > > I trust you are being serious here. > > You wanna repost this neatly so I can take a look > at it? > > Homer I am serious. ======================================================= Sandwich Process (run repetitively to EP) David Letterman wants to know: Sandwiches you like or have liked. This can be run solo or dual. It cannot be overrun. It can be run on anyone at any case level. Prerequisite: The PC must like or have liked sandwiches and know who David Letterman is. ======================================================== Standard Tech 97 When viewing an incident the PC should always check to see if a STANDARD (something that stands out like a flag or an ensign) is part of the incident. When it is there, the PC should focus his attention on the standard which will then expand into a new incident (or something). It would be nice if the auditor would actually command the PC to do this. Many PCs instinctively use this method but have to pretend that they are looking for an earlier similar incident. ========================================================= ndc ================ http://www.clearing.org ==================== Mon Jun 26 18:06:02 EDT 2023 FTP://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/ndc/ndc1.memo WWW://www.clearing.org BLOG://adoretheproof.blogspot.com Send mail to [email protected] saying help ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof =================== Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty. Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect. Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty. Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.