Out Of Breath Rebecca Donovan Free Pdf.zip
EZBEIDY CITLALI LEMUS MANILLA <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Dec 2023 01:26:00 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | alt.collecting.juke-boxes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Worldwide, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female malignancy a= nd the leading cause of cancer mortality in women.1,2 Radiotherapy (RT) is = an essential component of multimodal breast cancer treatment. Adjuvant irra= diation to the residual breast after wide local excision of the primary tum= or provides equivalent outcomes to mastectomy while ensuring superior cosme= sis.3,4,5 In patients with risk factors after mastectomy, adjuvant radiothe= rapy improves overall survival and local control.6,7 Due to improvements in= breast cancer treatment, the number of long-term survivors has increased o= ver the past decades.8 With larger numbers surviving, more patients become = at risk of developing a wide range of late radiation-related side effects. = Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with left-sided breast cancer is cha= racterized by exposure of significant portion of the heart volume to high d= oses of irradiation.9 Pathophysiology of radiotherapy-induced cardiac toxic= ity involves damage of blood vessels and interstitial fibrosis, leading to = coronary artery disease, valvular abnormalities, myocardial dysfunction, pe= ricardial disease and conductive disturbances. These changes can become cli= nically manifest several years or even decades after treatment, leading to = increased risk for cardiac morbidity and death.10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1= 9,20,21,22,23,24 The increased risk is proportional to the dose received by= the heart, begins within years after exposure and continues for decades.12= Various radiotherapy techniques, including breath hold (BH) during treatme= nt have been proposed to reduce the cardiac dose.25,26 It is expected that = these maneuvers will result in reduced probability of late clinical manifes= tations of cardiac events.12,27,28 Voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (= V-DIBH) radiotherapy has been studied in the setting of breast conserving t= reatment and post-mastectomy.25,26 Using this technique, the distance from = the chest wall to the heart increases during deep inspiration, resulting in= a decrease of cardiac volume in the radiotherapy field. While consistency = and stability of V-DIBH has been demonstrated, real-time positional monitor= ing is advocated in daily practice to apply corrective actions due to intra= -fractional movements.29,30 In 2015, we implemented V-DIBH for patients und= ergoing leftsided breast cancer radiotherapy, based on a prospective observ= ational study protocol. This implementation in routine practice was based o= n the existent body of evidence in favor of V-DIBH.25,26 We aimed to ensure= controlled transition to the new routine technique and to report on feasib= ility of this approach in our clinical setting and its dosimetric impact. O= ur hypothesis was that V-DIBH, when compared with free-breathing (FB) techn= ique, will result in statistically significant reduction of the commonly re= ported cardiac dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters without compromising = the coverage of the target volume with prescribed dose. We also hypothesize= d that V-DIBH treatment results in non-inferior set-up accuracy when compar= ed with FB. Our study was approved by the institutional Medical Research Ce= nter (Study No. 15330/15), on 14. 10. 2015 by the Hamad Medical Corporation= Medical Research Centre. Table 1Vertical, longitudinal and lateral couch shifts and corresponding sy= stematic and random errors for the initial 18 patients treated with volunta= ry deep inspiration breath-hold (V-DIBH) and a historic control treated wit= h free-breathing (FB) technique. Differences between the two approaches wer= e non-significant. out of breath rebecca donovan free pdf.zip DOWNLOAD https://shurll.com/2wHKPz When compared with free-breathing radiotherapy, voluntary deep inspiration = breath-hold enabled significant reduction of cardiac doses without compromi= sing the target volume coverage in our cohort of left-sided breast cancer p= atients. Treatment setup shifts and population systematic and random errors= were small and not significantly different from the historic controls trea= ted with the free-breathing technique. Our systematic approach to patient c= oaching was reflected in low rate of conversion to free-breathing radiother= apy. Based on the positive results of our present study and experience gain= ed, we adopted V-DIBH radiotherapy as standard treatment for all left-sided= breast cancer patients. Long follow up is needed to confirm the clinical i= mpact of the presented favorable dosimetric benefit. eebf2c3492