Re: "Researchers shoot holes in study touted for confirming 'masks work' in curbing COVID"
"Scout" <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:15:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.colorado.grand-junction,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"George Pimptin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 02 Dec 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some > news:[email protected]: > >> On 12/2/2021 8:30 AM, Yak wrote: >>> On 12/2/21 11:23 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/2/2021 7:38 AM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>> https://justthenews.com/ >>>> >>>> No, they did not "shoot holes" in any study. >>>> >>>> Masks work. >>> >>> Masks >> >> "Surgical masks reduce COVID-19 spread, large-scale study shows" Hmmm.. The masks I see for sale and which the overwhelming majority of people use have the following disclaimer "Not for Medical Use" That would make it a NON-surgical mask. What does your study show about them???? ....or are we to ASSUME that ANYTHING works just as well? Does that mean if I get a wire mesh mask, that's adequate protection because it's a 'mask'?