Re: From the GOP

Bill Flett <[email protected]> Sun, 30 May 2021 11:33:19 -0700
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.comedy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/30/2021 11:25 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:18:16 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/30/2021 11:06 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 5/30/21 12:41 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>> On 5/30/2021 8:13 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> https://www.gopusa.com/inflation-under-biden-continues-as-prices-went-up-3-6-in-april-data-shows/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> A rising inflation trend continues as prices rose by 3.6% in April from a
>>>>> year ago, reflecting increases in both goods and services, according to data
>>>>> released Friday by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
>>>>
>>>> This is *not* inflation.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Prices rose 0.6% in the past month in a key inflation indicator
>>>>
>>>> These are *real* price increases, not merely monetary.  Lots of commodities
>>>> are in short supply as spending resumes.
>>>>
>>>>> The Federal Reserve has said that a rise in inflation will be temporary, with
>>>>> prices dropping as the pandemic subsides. The Fed has indicated it is in no
>>>>> rush to raise interest rates.
>>>>
>>>> Exactly.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> After-tax income slid 15.1% in April from the record level in March that had
>>>>> been hiked by the billions of dollars in stimulus payments.
>>>>
>>>> Exactly.  So there has not been any fall in long-term income.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Personal income declined 13.1%, but that was less than the predictions of
>>>>> 14%. The government stimulus checks earlier this year had pushed personal
>>>>> income up 20.9% in March.
>>>>>
>>>>> After taxes and other withholdings, disposable personal income dropped 14.6%.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the end of stimulus payments, *not* because the earned income of
>>>> employed people was falling, or because unemployment was rising.
>>>>
>>>> Keep your stupid fucking mouth shut about economics.  You don't know a thing.
>>>
>>> It appears that degree notwithstanding, you also know little about ecponimics [sic]
>>
>> About what?  What the fuck is "ecponimics"?
> 
> I just conceded defeat again.

Yep.