[Spam] Re: It's Time to Stigmatize Some People Again

On 10 Nov 2025, pothead <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> On 2025-11-10, useapen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There it was this morning, plain as day. It was a screenshot of a
>> woman going off about how her food stamps were cut off, the $1,000
>> per month she and her family supposedly get from the government,
>> juxtaposed against her being called out by someone else for hair
>> extensions, expensive trips to the nail salon, and tattoos. In short,
>> she wastes money on unnecessary things and then demands money from
>> the government to support herself. 
>>
>> She's squandering money on luxuries while relying on the taxpayers to
>> fund her groceries for anywhere between four and seven people in her
>> household. 
>>
>> And worse, there's no sense of shame among many of these people.
>> There's no concept that maybe they should keep their heads down and
>> just be thankful for what they've gotten.
>>
>> Instead, many tried to brag about what all they'd do if they didn't
>> get SNAP money. They threatened violence and got away with it.
>>
>> There used to be a stigma for being a welfare recipient, and while I
>> get that it's not always fair to stigmatize people for temporary
>> setbacks, too many people are still making a lifestyle based on
>> government largesse. 
>>
>> These people are too comfortable doing so and are too demanding to be
>> permitted to go about their lives unchallenged.
>>
>> People who refuse to work, who maintain large households and exist
>> off of taxpayer money, shouldn't be accepted. They shouldn't be
>> tolerated. They should be demeaned and mocked as the leeches they
>> are. 
>>
>> When I was younger, this happened. It was considered mean to do, but
>> it at least meant those who got welfare in some form at least kept
>> quiet about it. Many were made to feel a sense of shame about it,
>> which often led them to take steps to get off of it and to pay their
>> own way. Others were too damn lazy to care, though, so reforms had to
>> be made by implementing work requirements.
>>
>> But those requirements are so minor that recipients are getting off
>> easy. 
>>
>> For those of you who may not remember, back during the reform debate,
>> some literally thought they were entitled to welfare money as their
>> due. That hasn't changed, and that's why these people need to be
>> stigmatized. They need to be made to feel bad about the position they
>> have put themselves in.
>>
>> And it's not just the welfare queens, either.
>>
>> There are a lot of people who are in positions due to their own
>> decisions who somehow think they deserve special treatment. You
>> majored in Lesbian Fruit Bat Studies in college, and you can't get a
>> job? No wonder you can't. You've proven you're too irresponsible to
>> be trusted with your own oxygen supply, much less anything that
>> requires the least bit of responsibility beyond putting on clothes to
>> cover your reproductive parts. 
>>
>> You see racism everywhere around you, and that's why you're an a**?
>> Maybe what you chalk up to racism is because you're an insufferable
>> piece of filth, and people don't care about your ethnicity, just that
>> you're a horrible human being.
>>
>> Communist? Enough said, mockery and laughter to follow.
>>
>> Too many people get away with being terrible in various ways. We need
>> to stigmatize these people for exactly what they are: Con artists,
>> deadbeats, and pathetic excuses for human beings barely qualified to
>> turn oxygen into carbon dioxide.
>>
>> Sure, there's a line there. Each of ours might be a little different,
>> but there's a big difference between a disabled veteran who can't
>> work versus someone really upset that our tax dollars won't be
>> available to fund their eyebrow waxing. Those who cross that line
>> need to be the subject of scorn, if for no other reason than to make
>> it loudly apparent that it's unacceptable to do that when you can
>> work. 
>>
>> Do enough of that, shame people into cleaning up their lives on their
>> own, without expecting someone to do it for them, and we really will
>> make America great again.
>>
>> https://townhall.com/columnists/tomknighton/2025/11/07/its-time-to-
>> stigmatize-some-people-again-n2666120
> 
> This type of scam is quite prevelant and it crosses all ethnic
> backgrounds. These days scamming the system, which is very easy to do
> if you know how, is worn as a badge of honor.
> NOT by the people who really need assistance but by the leeches and
> grifters who are able to work but refuse to or who collect government
> checks and work tax free off the books.
> 
> And it would surprise you how many people with fancy homes, high end
> cars, extravegant vacations are indeed scamming  the system.

Go look at the church free food lines, note what kind of cars are in the 
lines and what color the drivers are.  

> Why?
> Because it is so darn easy and in the past the government did not do
> anything but the most basic checks for eligibility.

Nobody checks unless they want to make an example of someone.

> That has all changed with the trump administration and the amount of
> fraud and waste in the government assistance programs is staggering.
> And these are funds that could be allocated to people who really need
> some assistance for whatever reason. 
> 
> Of course if you point this out you will be labeled a bigot, racist
> and so forth. It's the classic tactic of the demonrats.

Whenever a Democrat does that they should get all their teeth kicked out.

> The old "do you want people to starve?" shtick.
> The problem the demonrats have is that the voters are not falling for
> this routine anymore and hence the government shutdown where the
> demonrats attempted to pull the bigot, republicans want you to starve 
> game once again but failed to mention one "minor fact" which is NOBODY
> wants people to starve however the republicans AND the voters do not
> want to fund welfare, healthcare and so forth for illegal migrants. 
> They kept leaving that part out but the voters quickly caught on to
> the ruse. And as for medical care, if an illegal is in dire need of
> medical care, patch him or her up and once well enough to travel
> deport them back to their home country. 
> 
> The system is not designed to accomodate the massive number of
> invaders that Biden allowed into the country. You might want to ask UK
> and Germany about that one. It's not sustainable.

Put a bounty on them, $50 a head.

> Laws are in place for a reason. A country without laws that are
> enforced is no longer a country but simply a wasteland run by anarchy.
> If the demonrat leftists don't like the laws, vote out the
> representatives who support them. 

Democrats pass laws but refuse to enforce them.

Unless it's for a fag or one of their tranny chopatitty victims.