Re: Win32/RAMNIT.A Anyone?
David_B <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:55:11 +0000
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.virus,alt.comp.anti-virus,microsoft.public.security.virus,ba.internet |
|---|---|
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/08/2010 01:46, FromTheRafters wrote: > "John Slade" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> On 8/4/2010 2:40 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> "John Slade"<[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. >>>> Why do you think they call the software used to clean >>>> trojans and worms, "Anti-Virus" software? >>> >>> Generally, they call it antimalware unless it is also effective >>> against >>> viruses and worms (which are self-replicators). If it is effective >>> against viruses, they call it an antivirus. Antivirus programs can >>> also >>> detect some non-replicating malware. >> >> They call it that because it's quite common to refer to all >> malware as viurses. Been this way for decades. > > Being wrong is quite common also. > >>>> I'm sure you don't think that they only clean viruses >>>> and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a matter >>>> of semantics. >>> >>> Of course it is, but semantics shouldn't be a dismissive word. The >>> meanings of words are *important* to effective communications. >>> >> >> It's all a matter of who you're talking to. If the person wants >> to nitpick even though they know what a person means then what can you >> do but explain. > > I don't usually bother to correct non-professionals, although I do > mention that they are in error when they call non-replicators viruses. > In your case, being a "professional" you should know better. That you > refuse to accept the facts is just your personality getting in the way > of your professionalism. > >> I've worked for people who are very computer savvy and people who are >> new to computers. I use all the terms to describe the problem and >> rarely hear anyone nitpick about using the word "virus" to describe a >> trojan or worm. It's just acceptable. >> >>>> Just about all of the major anti-malware vendors have >>>> products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because it just >>>> stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? >>> >>> We all know this, and we don't like it one bit. The fact remains that >>> viruses are a special case requiring more than what many antimalware >>> applications are equipped to handle. >> >> It seems to anger you on some level. > > Not really, it angers me when they call viruses malware - but that's > another story that you would not be interested in. Why should a virus not be classified as malware? >> I don't care in the least what they call it, as long as it does the >> job. > > What job? > > If you use an antimalware application to remove viruses, you can be > giving a still infested machine back to your customer. Perhaps he, and maybe many others, *DO* return infested machines to their customers! If the 'professional' doesn't know, how would the customer?!!! Follow-up set. ......