Re: The zero-days are numbered

On Thu, 21 May 2026 01:11:00 +0000, "p-0 0-h the cat (coder)
<[email protected]>" wrote:

>On 20/05/2026 22:24, Shadow wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 May 2026 12:07:00 +0000, "p-0 0-h the cat (coder)
>> <[email protected]>" wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>> https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/
>>>
>>> "Multiple white cursor arrows scattered across a bright orange background.
>>>
>>> Since February, the Firefox team has been working around the clock using
>>> frontier AI models to find and fix latent security vulnerabilities in
>>> the browser. We wrote previously about our collaboration with Anthropic
>>> to scan Firefox with Opus 4.6, which led to fixes for 22
>>> security-sensitive bugs in Firefox 148.
>>>
>>> As part of our continued collaboration with Anthropic, we had the
>>> opportunity to apply an early version of Claude Mythos Preview to
>>> Firefox. This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271
>>> vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation."
>> 
>> 	Someone was either bribed to or was incompetent enough to
>> write those 271 vulnerabilities into the code. Shit! (no relation)
>> some people even write things for political ideology. See notepad
>> fascist programmer.
>
>Alternatively a cat might say FF is a dynamic multi-threaded application 
>written by large teams of programmers, many transient, and therefore not 
>surprisingly sometimes in the organized chaos and unpredictability of it 
>all unexpected things can happen. Just a thought. Cats are crazy like 
>that. Thinking. I know, it's a Darwinian dead end.

	Is "thinking" even allowed anymore?
	[]'s
>
>>> Will they ever outfox Dusty and Shit the cat?
>> 
>> 	I'm sure AI will. M$ announced there will be no more
>> white-collar jobs available in 18 months time. AI can do it better, at
>> a much bigger profit for the billionaires. Management is a thing of
>> the past.
>
>Well let's hope it works out better than their move to India. Don't bet 
>the business on that.
>
>
>> 	Doctors will not be replaced because the best AI can do is 30%
>> correct diagnosis.You need to actually touch the patient to diagnose
>> anything. 
>
>I think we might agree on this. To be fair, the right Doctor is light 
>years ahead on diagnosis but for example GPs are generally average at 
>say Dermatology because many conditions look the same. I know you are 
>special but most aren't.
>
>So in my humble opinion always get a diagnosis from a Doc and if it's 
>stubborn or important from the best consultant you can afford. Figuring 
>out who is the best though... difficult.
>
>In the spirit of cat fairness I have to say that AI is kinda good though 
>for background info once you have a diagnosis, and with caveats 
>depending on the condition, researching self help alternative or 
>complimentary treatments.
>
>Hugs []
>
>> I supposed doctors could be replaced by a full body high
>> definition MRI for every single consult, but where's the profit in
>> that?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Cat's lives matter!
>
>p-0.0-h the cat, the number one influencer on the Usenet Social!
>Live everyday like you're a really cool cat!
>Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021