Re: Kerio 2.1.5 ... The Myth Busted

On 22/05/2026 15:19, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2026 09:08:04 -0300
> Shadow <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 22 May 2026 01:02:00 +0000, The Cat
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [ The Cat ]ooh ooh
>>>
> Ah that one; with the 20 line "sig"

Oh no! Don't get me plonked. I so care. Are you happy now. Do you 
seriously think I give a fuck. Plonk me. Who's the loser. Silly fucker. 
Now fuck off or counter with an argument worth a shit. I fucking hate 
people like you. Who do you think wrote my sig. Mostly people like you, 
and a few with a sense of humour granted. Bye

> 
>>> So, question, Kerio 2.1.5 is still popular for reasons that to me just
>>> don't add up. It's supposed application filtering was I think exposed as
> 
> []
>>> Retro Hardware & OS Abandonment: Kerio 2.1.5 is still the gold standard
>>> if you are deliberately running an air-gapped Windows 98, ME, or Windows
>>> 2000 legacy machine. Modern Windows Firewall obviously doesn't exist
>>> there, and Kerio runs perfectly on an old Pentium II with 64MB of RAM.
> 
> If I'm running an airgapped PC I hardly need a firewall!! I suppose one
> could copy via usb stick to a dodgy (16/32 bit) app there and Kerio
> would alert you about phoning home.
>