Re: [OT] [Update] 7-Zip 26.02

Shadow <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Jul 2026 19:32:05 -0300
Newsgroups alt.comp.freeware
Organization A noiseless patient Shadow
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 19:01:00 +0000, "p-0 0-h the cat (coder)"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 01/07/2026 17:01, Shadow wrote:
>
>>>> 	Your personal data makes billionaires  Need I list them? You are paying even more
>>>> than if you paid cash.
>>>> 	According to xxxx, I have "severe diabetes". So no decent
>>>> hospital plan will take me. Too much of a liability. Only the crummy
>>>> ones, that don't care if you die or not, and charge double.
>>>> 	Someone typed that into my medical record. I'm not diabetic.
>>>> Never have been. Nobody in my family is.
>>>> 	Expensive.
>>>> 	[]'s
>>>
>>> Yunno, I swear we were discussing freeware. So, you are saying "Someone
>>> typed 'you are diabetic' into your medical record.". I suspect not using
>>> freeware or the data made public. It's a data input issue. Did they have
>>> to submit your data to gain access and use the software. I suspect their
>>> username and password was enough. Probably. What's your point. Are you
>>> blaming the programmers, the billionaires or who? and for what. Confused.
>> 
>> 	The billionaires. 
>
>Plural? Sounds like a gag. How many billionaires does it take to input 
>Shadow's medical data?

	The Brazilian government sold all our present and future
medical data to Glugle, Amakon and Meta. They don't input it, the
doctors do. The psycho-billionaires just syphon it off.

	That was one of Bolsonaros ministers, Marcelo Queiroga. I have
links if you want. He called it "open health" (yes, in English)because
data would be "openly" available for sale.
>
>So, these billionaires input data as a side hustle? Bit of ready cash? 
>Were they multi tasking. Yunno, running a multi billion pound company, 
>on the phone constantly, taking turns at the keyboard, not paying 
>attention, slip of the mouse and you're a severe diabetic. Happens all 
>the time, god I hate them, taking our jobs, and our diabetic free 
>status. They just don't care. Only the other day I was saying to the 
>maid. "If that fucking Mxsk fella turns up again, touting for some cash 
>in hand data input work, tell 'in to fuck off," I dunno what he does but 
>Gurgle can't fix it. We had to call in Shit the cat, and you know what 
>he charges. He fixed it though, bloody cat is brilliant. I tell all my 
>friends, don't waste yer time on Dusty and Batty the bat. Call Shit NOW!"
>
>> Gurgle refuses to redact my medical file
>> because they get paid by health insurance groups for lists of "high
>> risk patients".. Bad for business if it turns out their data was
>> false.
>
>Alternatively, assuming you didn't just make this up, 

	I didn't. I made a formal complaint because I was tired of
being called to "diabetes meetings" and being offered medicine that
would cure diabetes "once and for all as long as I take it twice a
day". That's big pharma, BTW, just one of the groups that buy our
medical Glugle/Amakon/Meta data.
	It cannot be undone. The box marked "diabetes" is read-only.

>maybe, just maybe, 
>this isn't Gurgle's data, perhaps they were contracted to write the 
>software or they host it. I think you need professional IT help. Call 
>Shit NOW! Do it right, or do it twice. I mean Dusty's good but he only 
>gets things half working and he only works mornings.
>
>
>>> If you have to submit your data to use a program, your email address
>>> say, you are obliged to do so. It's an obligation. You say that's a
>>> cost
>> 
>> 	Of course it is. Private data is one of the most valuable
>> commodities today.
>>
>>> , and it's 'silly' to argue otherwise
>> 	
>> 	"silly" is rather a mild word. I have naughtier ones but Ron
>> and the other alt.comp.freeware moderators  would probably object.
>> 
>>> , so it's not freeware, so are
>>> some obligations more equal than others. Yunno, because the obligations
>>> in the GPL have a cost.
>> 
>> 	None at all. You don't have to download, alter and publish the
>> source code. Or contribute in any way to the developers.
>
>Ah! I see you are getting it, at last, yes, well done, the IP is 
>unusable for most small businesses and start ups, higher costs, things 
>you buy, cost more, yes, you are getting there, there's a cost to you 
>though, oh well done, you aren't my first convert but I feel if I can 
>get through to you I can get through to just about anybody, I'm ready to 
>take on those smelly greybeards and shine a light on this tyranny that 
>has affected us all, apart from the billionaires that is, didn't my 
>moonlighting friend tell you lot to fuck off recently

	Not that I'm aware of. If he did, he's probably on my /dev/nul
filter and I didn't see it.

>at least the 
>others just give some lawyers some work and work around the problem.I 
>think he just outflanked you.

	Outflank me? LOL. That catnip must be top-shelf.

> Anyway, hurrah, I can move on, I'll leave 
>it to you to bring enlightenment to the whole of Brazil, or are you so 
>fired up now that you no longer have to play the fool for Linux that you 
>feel up to tasking yourself to enlighten the whole of South America? Go 
>for it. The cats have your back!

	I'm not a Linux fanatic. I just use it for really important(to
me) stuff. Most of the time I'm on XP.
	[]'s
>
>
>Cat's lives matter!
>
>p-0.0-h the cat, the number one influencer on the Usenet Social!
>Live everyday like you're a really cool cat!
>Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021