Re: [OT] [Update] 7-Zip 26.02
Shadow <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Jul 2026 19:32:05 -0300
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Shadow |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 19:01:00 +0000, "p-0 0-h the cat (coder)" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 01/07/2026 17:01, Shadow wrote: > >>>> Your personal data makes billionaires Need I list them? You are paying even more >>>> than if you paid cash. >>>> According to xxxx, I have "severe diabetes". So no decent >>>> hospital plan will take me. Too much of a liability. Only the crummy >>>> ones, that don't care if you die or not, and charge double. >>>> Someone typed that into my medical record. I'm not diabetic. >>>> Never have been. Nobody in my family is. >>>> Expensive. >>>> []'s >>> >>> Yunno, I swear we were discussing freeware. So, you are saying "Someone >>> typed 'you are diabetic' into your medical record.". I suspect not using >>> freeware or the data made public. It's a data input issue. Did they have >>> to submit your data to gain access and use the software. I suspect their >>> username and password was enough. Probably. What's your point. Are you >>> blaming the programmers, the billionaires or who? and for what. Confused. >> >> The billionaires. > >Plural? Sounds like a gag. How many billionaires does it take to input >Shadow's medical data? The Brazilian government sold all our present and future medical data to Glugle, Amakon and Meta. They don't input it, the doctors do. The psycho-billionaires just syphon it off. That was one of Bolsonaros ministers, Marcelo Queiroga. I have links if you want. He called it "open health" (yes, in English)because data would be "openly" available for sale. > >So, these billionaires input data as a side hustle? Bit of ready cash? >Were they multi tasking. Yunno, running a multi billion pound company, >on the phone constantly, taking turns at the keyboard, not paying >attention, slip of the mouse and you're a severe diabetic. Happens all >the time, god I hate them, taking our jobs, and our diabetic free >status. They just don't care. Only the other day I was saying to the >maid. "If that fucking Mxsk fella turns up again, touting for some cash >in hand data input work, tell 'in to fuck off," I dunno what he does but >Gurgle can't fix it. We had to call in Shit the cat, and you know what >he charges. He fixed it though, bloody cat is brilliant. I tell all my >friends, don't waste yer time on Dusty and Batty the bat. Call Shit NOW!" > >> Gurgle refuses to redact my medical file >> because they get paid by health insurance groups for lists of "high >> risk patients".. Bad for business if it turns out their data was >> false. > >Alternatively, assuming you didn't just make this up, I didn't. I made a formal complaint because I was tired of being called to "diabetes meetings" and being offered medicine that would cure diabetes "once and for all as long as I take it twice a day". That's big pharma, BTW, just one of the groups that buy our medical Glugle/Amakon/Meta data. It cannot be undone. The box marked "diabetes" is read-only. >maybe, just maybe, >this isn't Gurgle's data, perhaps they were contracted to write the >software or they host it. I think you need professional IT help. Call >Shit NOW! Do it right, or do it twice. I mean Dusty's good but he only >gets things half working and he only works mornings. > > >>> If you have to submit your data to use a program, your email address >>> say, you are obliged to do so. It's an obligation. You say that's a >>> cost >> >> Of course it is. Private data is one of the most valuable >> commodities today. >> >>> , and it's 'silly' to argue otherwise >> >> "silly" is rather a mild word. I have naughtier ones but Ron >> and the other alt.comp.freeware moderators would probably object. >> >>> , so it's not freeware, so are >>> some obligations more equal than others. Yunno, because the obligations >>> in the GPL have a cost. >> >> None at all. You don't have to download, alter and publish the >> source code. Or contribute in any way to the developers. > >Ah! I see you are getting it, at last, yes, well done, the IP is >unusable for most small businesses and start ups, higher costs, things >you buy, cost more, yes, you are getting there, there's a cost to you >though, oh well done, you aren't my first convert but I feel if I can >get through to you I can get through to just about anybody, I'm ready to >take on those smelly greybeards and shine a light on this tyranny that >has affected us all, apart from the billionaires that is, didn't my >moonlighting friend tell you lot to fuck off recently Not that I'm aware of. If he did, he's probably on my /dev/nul filter and I didn't see it. >at least the >others just give some lawyers some work and work around the problem.I >think he just outflanked you. Outflank me? LOL. That catnip must be top-shelf. > Anyway, hurrah, I can move on, I'll leave >it to you to bring enlightenment to the whole of Brazil, or are you so >fired up now that you no longer have to play the fool for Linux that you >feel up to tasking yourself to enlighten the whole of South America? Go >for it. The cats have your back! I'm not a Linux fanatic. I just use it for really important(to me) stuff. Most of the time I'm on XP. []'s > > >Cat's lives matter! > >p-0.0-h the cat, the number one influencer on the Usenet Social! >Live everyday like you're a really cool cat! >Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Google Fuchsia - 2021