Re: Security News This Week: Hackers Are Erasing Western Digital Hard Drives Remotely
nospam <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:16:41 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,comp.os.linux.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <290620211816412630%[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, Mayayana <[email protected]> wrote: > | > The problem is with "My Book Live", an idiotic and unsafe > | > "personal cloud" device designed to be accessed from > | > online. So as with remote desktop, the real problem is with > | > people thinking it's safe to allow direct access to their > | > computers from the Internet. > | > | It's not 'idiotic' and it's not 'unsafe' > > There are some things that can't be made entirely safe. not just some things. *everything* cannot be made entirely safe. > One > is javascript in browsers. Another is setting up your system > for remote access. There are reeasons to risk both. There's > no sensible reason to risk it in order to have a "private cloud". > Thus, idiotic. there are plenty of reasons for a private cloud, which can be extremely safe when done correctly. part of that requires not using abandoned hardware with unpatched exploits. > | Also note that the reports are about people 'losing all their data'! > | How is that possible? Did they only have *one* copy of their data? > > Maybe so, maybe not. That wasn't the point. The point was that > their disks were erased. Rather shocking, don't you think, backup > or not? You can pretend there's no risk to what > you're doing but it just isn't true. everything has a risk. hard drives can fail without any cloud. fire/flood/etc. can destroy them (and a lot more). users can mistakenly delete important files. if the users had multiple copies, then it doesn't matter if one of them is lost. there are others.