Re: Security News This Week: Hackers Are Erasing Western Digital Hard Drives Remotely
nospam <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:50:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,comp.os.linux.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <300620211250045799%[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, Mayayana <[email protected]> wrote: > There was an argument in a Reddit privacy forum. Apparently some > people were stunned that their thermostat was taken over, while > others said they had agreed to it in exchange for lower rates. But > the reported case seemed fishy: People "agreed" in exchange for > being entered into some sort of mickey mouse sweepstakes. But > who would even think of needing to agree to, or watch out for, > such a thing when simply buying a thermostat? they didn't 'simply buy a thermostat'. they received a discount, and in some cases, it was completely free, which requires agreeing to certain terms. had they paid full price from a store, there would be no strings attached. in fact, the utility would have no way of knowing there is even a smart thermostat in use. > Google came to my mind because I just started reading The Age > of Surveillance Capitalism. In the introduction the author uses the > example of Google's Nest thermostat, which has app tie-ins, motion > detectors, and connections to other devices that can allow Google > to track and study people's activities around the house. A study > showed that anyone attempting to actually have a real contract > to approve of all such spying through the device would require > over 1,000 contracts... And of course, these things have been > hacked. But the people who buy them don't think of that. Nor > should they. The tech geniuses are all telling them it's the > greatest thing since sliced bread. You can probably get an app > to have your Nest call for your Egg McMuffin to be delivered as > soon as the connected security cameras detect your eyes opening. > Who wouldn't want that? :) those who don't like egg mcmuffins, obviously.