Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters?

On 6/20/2026 2:48 PM, Paul wrote:
> 
> Silicon chips are relatively inanimate objects, at least at the moment.
> .....
> When you do that, you have to know the tiling pattern of cells
> on the chip surface. A silicon chip may not have an orderly X*Y
> array on the surface, so first you have to map the address of a pixel
> by shining a tiny dot of light on various parts of the chip, and
> see what responds.

Jedi witchcraft does not need to know the tilling pattern of brain cells 
when you use the Force to alter the mind of a human, Master. As computer 
chips get thinner and narrower, they become more and more like a human 
brain, thus making their tilling pattern to look the same. So... maybe 
you don't need to use a light saber at all to slaughter drones. :)

BTW, I was talking about integrated circuits aka I.C. Are old, black 
I.C.s less vulnerable to wireless exploit than modern chips? Sorry, Master.

-- 

    @~@   Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
   / v \  May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
  /( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
    ^ ^   https://github.com/changmw/changmw