Re: Hardware Raid controller?
T <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Oct 2025 23:54:13 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/21/25 10:56 PM, Paul wrote: > On Tue, 10/21/2025 9:45 PM, T wrote: >> On 10/21/25 6:44 PM, T wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Any of you guys have a recommendation for a hardware >>> based RAID controller that takes NVMe drives? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> -T >>> >> >> That is Windows server friendly > > I thought we'd addressed that in a previous discussion. > > It was a RAID controller for NVMe, that did not rely > on an NVMe module being in the computer BIOS package. > > For example, my ten year old 4930K machine, the BIOS > has no NVMe module support, it cannot enumerate an NVMe > if one was placed on a $10 PCIe card blank. > > The solution to that, was a couple models of RAID controllers > made by a particular company, where the ROM on the RAID > controller, contained a BIOS-interval module for scanning > the NVMe for boot-able materials (UEFI boot, let's say). > > There are two kinds of RAID modules: > > 1) Simple and cheap card where the computer software > does RAID0 or RAID1 between two NVMe module, and it is > all possible because it is a kind of "soft RAID" and > simple PCIe wiring and BIOS level modules (like maybe an > Intel thing), enable a solution to be made for pennies > for the infrastructure (the two NVMe still costs hundreds each). > > 2) The fancy card, with the support on board. There, you are > at least paying for the loadable module in ROM. On the more > expensive of the cards, maybe an XOR unit is available for RAID5 > or the like. > > The most effective card, is capable of 56GB/sec or so, > but it might not boot the computer and it might be a "data-only" > array capable of assisting an AI to load a complete model in only > a second. That would be eight modules at 7GB/sec, rather than > four modules at 14GB/sec (because the PCIe5 modules, they're > still playing with them and trying to improve the numbers). > > Summary: There are boot drives and data drives, when it comes to > plugin/addon PCIe sled NVMe devices. You should state clearly > what your priorities are for the product: > > 1) absolute bandwidth (RAID0), boot not an issue, data only card > 2) a reliable boot card for OS (not likely to be more than 2TB of protected-capacity) > 3) a reliable (RAID5/RAID6) with XOR assist and wire speed > There may be more than just a PCIe switch chip on it. Heatsink likely. > Maybe 48TB of storage. > > Few consumer machines have sufficient slots to build a battleship. > But some of the servers with $1000+ mobo, have seven PCIe5 x16 slots, > and are suited to high speed adventure. The CPU costs $10K, so why not. > > https://www.techpowerup.com/248873/highpoint-releases-bootable-quad-m-2-nvme-raid-card-the-ssd7102 > > RAID0,1,10 PCIe3 sleds (slow) > https://www.amazon.ca/HighPoint-SSD7104-Controller-Windows-Systems/dp/B08M11TGDV > > Not seeing a lot of RAID5/RAID6/XOR-accelerated ones. > https://www.servethehome.com/highpoint-ssd7540-8x-m-2-nvme-ssd-card-review-sabrent/ > > Driverless is nice (avoids a DKMS issue on Linux), but I still don't think much > of the RAIDing options. > > https://www.highpoint-tech.com/product-page/ssd6202a > > Paul Thank you!