Re: What PC hardware diagnostic stress-testing freeware can you recommend?
Arlen Holder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.microsoft.windows,alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mixmin |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:29:24 -0700, Mike Easter wrote: > What kind of mouse? USB or PS/2 - optical or ball Hi Mike, Thanks for asking, where I was hoping to pick folks' brains to locate specific debugging software to stress test the mouse and its drivers. The mouse is a USB optical mouse, which is so worn that whatever manufacturer was printed on the outside is long gone, but the "Mouse Properties" in the control panel says the manufacturer is Microsoft and that it's an "HID-compliant mouse". o Win+R > control main.cpl > Hardware > Properties But it's easier to just remember this instead: o Win+R > control mouse [I strive to do everything from the Win+R menu that I can.] Looking at the same info in the Device Manager for the mouse: Win+R > devmgmt.msc I noticed I have it set to be able to wake the computer but for the computer not to turn it off in low power situations, which is fine. The Sieber USB Device Tree Viewer tells me something completely different though, as it says the "idVendor" is Lenovo, and the iProduct Language is "Lenovo USB Optical Mouse", which I didn't expect since the Device Manager said it's Microsoft. Oh oh. Logitech also shows up, so maybe the USB tree view is "remembering" old devices since the app has been running for days on end. Let me kill & restart it after clearing out all the USB entries by running the Sieber "Device Cleanup" tool. Nope. All three, Microsoft, Lenovo, and Logitech show up in the Sieber USB Device Tree Viewer for that port. Go figure. >> But I don't know of any tool, yet, that monitors mouse "glitchiness". >> o Do you? >> > No. Well, what I'll do is swap in another mouse, but all my mice are old, so maybe it's time to buy a new one. > >> RAM: 16127 MB total >> > I tho't you were previously using 32G. Naah. You thought that when you saw the MemTest86 results. I saw that you said that it was 32, oh, more than a week ago, but I didn't correct you 'cuz it didn't matter and we were working on tougher problems, like solving how to set up the Hirens Boot CD over USB for BIOS instead of for UEFI. It's been 16GB all along. :) >> While the test was idle, your CPU usage ranged from 18.7% to 60.8%. >> > What kind of 'idle' is that? (that is 20-60% cpu?) Well, I dunno. I was just using the PC normally. For me, normal is not gaming, nor do I run simulations, nor CAD design, etc. That was the whole point of the 24 hour test of "WhySoSlow", which was to check the PC in normal conductions. For sure, I could have run any number of CPU and GPU and RAM stress testers during that time frame which would have maxed out everything, but the point was normal use. Normal use for me is email, reading the news, editing some photos, editing some MS Word documents, installing some software, etc. You know, normal stuff. >> During the test hard pagefaults ranged from 0.0 to 9.1 pagefaults per second. >> The values reported are considered excellent. >> More info..<http://www.resplendence.com/whysoslow_help_hardpagefaults> > > I read that page. I don't understand why there should be the kind of > pagefaults it is reporting (9/sec) if you have 16G of ram. I don't understand the pagefaults either. Why is it dumping stuff out of RAM if it has plenty of RAM? I also don't understand the kernel responsiveness either bearing in mind usually the first BSOD is related to a kernel error of some sort: o <https://i.postimg.cc/9Q4m7tfM/bsod01.jpg> [UNEXPECTED KERNEL MODE TRAP] o <https://i.postimg.cc/DyNFnJcK/bsod02.jpg> [KERNEL SECURITY CHECK FAILURE] o <https://i.postimg.cc/zGRNBzdH/bsod03.jpg> [Preparing Automatic Repair] o <https://i.postimg.cc/9McHJGcy/bsod04.jpg> [Diagnosing your PC] o <https://i.postimg.cc/qq5fJSyG/bsod05.jpg> [Automatic Repair?] o <https://i.postimg.cc/JnFKGLYt/bsod06.jpg> [Automatic Repair failed] o <https://i.postimg.cc/gk3FFSr3/bsod07.jpg> [Reset your PC] o <https://i.postimg.cc/Pq30z0Fn/bsod08.jpg> [Booting, ferris dots] o <https://i.postimg.cc/JnSgSZLT/bsod09.jpg> [Lock screen success] o <https://i.postimg.cc/XYnhMnR0/bsod10.jpg> [MEMORY MANAGEMENT] o <https://i.postimg.cc/zGpQ89NH/bsod11.jpg> [POST STOPS BEFORE FINISHING] o <https://i.postimg.cc/1XxCvSG2/bsod12.jpg> [Booting, ferris dots] o <https://i.postimg.cc/T2mHpyG6/bsod13.jpg> [KERNEL SECURITY CHECK FAILURE] o <https://i.postimg.cc/g2cMSNhz/bsod14.jpg> [Booting, ferris dots] o <https://i.postimg.cc/5t6s1ypD/bsod15.jpg> [SYSTEM SERVICE EXCEPTION] o <https://i.postimg.cc/T1X0r9GX/bsod16.jpg> [KERNEL SECURITY CHECK FAILURE] o <https://i.postimg.cc/2yFwTZ8L/bsod17.jpg> [Lock screen success] o <https://i.postimg.cc/8khtTqBk/bsod18.jpg> [UNEXPECTED KERNEL MODE TRAP] > https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/ask-the-performance-team/the-basics-of-page-faults/ba-p/373120 > The Basics of Page Faults > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_fault >> Illegal accesses and invalid page faults, as invalid conditions, can result in a segmentation fault or bus error, resulting in programming termination (crash) or core dump, depending on the operating system environment. > >> Major page faults on conventional computers using hard disk drives for storage can have a significant impact on performance, <math operations> then the page fault would make the operation about 40,000 times slower. Hmmmmmm... I need to learn more about these page faults.