Re: HDD vs SSD
Paul <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > Aren't all digital photos recorded and stored in the camera on > flash memory SSDs ? My wife and I have been doing this for many > yaers on multiple cameras without any problem whatsoever. There's a difference in the churn rate. Your cameras are a mix of SLC, MLC, TLC. The ones with the smallest internal memories are SLC, good for 100,000 writes per cell. TLC is good for 3000 writes per cell. Modern SD cards (used in some cameras), use TLC and also have poor wear leveling. The SSD has the most work put into wear leveling, which is the insuring that the cells have roughly equal numbers of writes. The SSD "tries not to burn a hole in a single location inside". SD and flash sticks are supposed to have that, but we can't really be sure. The SD writes at 10MB/sec. The SSD writes at 450-500MB/sec (for SATA ones), or 2500MB/sec for NVMe ones. You can chart the daily usage of an SSD, because there is a counter recording the usage. Using the SSD toolbox, in theory they could make a nice graph for you, of daily usage. Back when I was initially charting it, I was doing around 20GB per day of SSD writes, which is roughly the equivalent of all the pictures on your busiest camera in one year. Done in one day. And while it's fun to pretend the general NAND matrix is the only failure point with flash, there's a thing called "critical data" used to manage the flash. On a TLC device, a small amount of SLC would be present, and the devices "grocery list" stays on there. That might be frequently updated, but because the area supports more writes, it's provisioned to make it work. Juggling stuff like this, is why it took a couple years for SSD firmware to have all the bugs worked out. Initially, catastrophic failures could happen out of the blue, because some part of critical data was mis-handled. The "fault model" then, is not completely hardware, but also includes a firmware component. Which was a significant issue at first on SSD drives. And why a guy like me tells you to "back it up". Paul