Re: Gigabyte BIOS Upgrade F11b BETA solved a lot of diffuse hardware problems

"Norm Why" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.comp.hardware
Organization retired
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>> A 'lot of diffuse hardware problems' is a story too long to recite. I 
>>>> was
>>>> reluctant to upgrade to a BETA BIOS. When I did I thought I'd bricked 
>>>> the machine. After a nights sleep, I realized the upgrade had reset to 
>>>> defaults / PCI monitor rather than PCIe. Now hardware works perfect. 
>>>> However, 500GB Seagate Barracuda says it has 30% life left. The red 
>>>> light that indicates drive activity glowed too often.
>>> The SMART table here can allow looking at individual parameters.
>>>
>>> http://hdtune.com/files/hdtune_255.exe
>>>
>>> That means the raw data field in the "Reallocated"
>>> has gone non-zero. At a guess.
>>>
>>>    Paul
>>
>> Thanks Paul,
>>
>> Using that tool, '(05) Reallocated Sector Count' was displayed for the 
>> 500GB Samsung EVO SSD, but not for the 500 GB Seagate Barracuda SSD. It's 
>> connected to a different controller, a PCIe (x1) SATAIII card.
>
> Sorry, I thought that 500GB Seagate Barracuda was a HDD.
>
> The HDTune tool is too old to display SSD tables properly.
>
> You were probably using some Toolkit to get that number,
> and maybe the Toolkit has the SMART table in it somewhere.
>
> My SSD samples here, tend to have rounded numbers,
> like 256GB or 512GB, rather than 250 and 500 values.
>
> The red glow, means SATA commands are coming in. The drive
> can still be writing, as it rearranges the data, but the
> LED does not light while this is happening. Any LED glows,
> indicate your OS is doing something. You would need to
> probe further, to figure out whether the operations are
> read or write. (Task Manager has I/O columns you can turn
> on for this.)
>
> The SSD has a processor inside, and it is running for as
> long as the drive has power.
>
>    Paul

Thanks again Paul,

I'm still trying to solve some performance issues. Here is:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 Shizuku Edition (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

           Sequential Read :   181.235 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   156.012 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :     2.018 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   150.887 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    26.341 MB/s [  6431.0 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    38.755 MB/s [  9461.7 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :   127.105 MB/s [ 31031.5 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   106.460 MB/s [ 25991.2 IOPS]

  Test : 50 MB [D: 21.7% (101.2/465.8 GB)] (x1)
  Date : 2021/04/10 15:58:02
    OS : Windows 8.1 Pro [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)

Test of Seagate Barracuda. Note anomalous Random Read 512KB :     2.018 
MB/s. Could this low number indicate problem with Seagate Barracuda or with 
cable. I'm using a 7 conductor cable, 2 pairs +/- data, 3 ground. Is my 
Seagate damaged? Is my cable insufficient? What about 'twinax'? Maybe my 
Startech PCIe SATA controller is to blame.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.