Re: What to do with a 240 GB Kingston SSD that is no longer detected?
Paul <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Norm Why wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a 240 GB Kingston SSD that went silent on my big rig. I tested it on
> another Win10 PC. I have a SATA/USB adapter and a power supply for SSD. This
> has permitted me to extract files in the past so I think it is a truth
> teller. A warm boot failed so a hard boot was required. The 240 GB Kingston
> SSD was not detected. I was hoping to do a scan disk and repair it. I have
> done this successfully with uSSD. Should I try this stunt on WinXP where it
> worked? WinX uses NTFS like all the rest. I could try test it on the big
> rig. Why would it go silent? Pin problems?
>
> Any hope to recover files?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Did you do a search on:
Kingston-part-number brick
and see if brickage is reported elsewhere ?
Older parts had more trouble with firmware failures
than newer parts. At one point, Intel rewrote some
Sandforce firmware because of problems it could see
in the code. Substitute the Kingston part number
for the Kingston-part-number field.
Brickage happens, for example, if the "critical data"
section of the SSD is corrupted. And that contains the
map from virtual to physical storage location. That's
how the controller "unscrambles" what is stored in the
Flash chip(s). Unfortunately, you cannot do a "linear scan"
of the Flash chip and use the data that way. Owning
a chip scanner is not enough.
Paul