Re: Laptop won't turn on, charging LED doesn't glow
micky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tweaknews |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In alt.comp.hardware, on Fri, 27 Aug 2021 02:01:05 -0400, Paul <[email protected]> wrote: >micky wrote: >> My laptop is plugged in but it won't turn on and the LED that shows it's >> charging isn't lit, even though it's plugged into a charger and the >> charger output is measured just now at about 17vDC >> >> I'm not surprised the battery is dead, I haven't used it for 6 months or >> more, but I do remember the charging-led working the last time it >> worked. >> >> This seems like an unusual sort of failure. Does it seem very >> improbable to you too? >> >> After "charging" for 30 minutes, it still won't turn on and the CD drive >> won't open by presssing the button. Is there a reset I don't know >> about? Could a failed battery keep the light from going on? Shouldn't >> it run off the charger even if the battery is bad? I know the answers >> are No, No, and Yes, but I'm grasping at straws. >> >> >> A friend gave me this Acer aspire E15, also called an E5-573-35AQ >> >> It worked fine when I got it and I added software. I think I bought a >> new psu to replace the missing one. >> >> Does this sound like something a very handy person could himself? >> >> (My friend called me to ask if he had left certain software on it. I >> don't think so but I was checking. If it's broken it's a good thing I >> know now instead of just before I leave on a trip.) > >The pack has probably run down, below the charging threshold. > >The internal charge management, won't shove any charge into it at >all, if it does not meet the minimum voltage. When it goes below >the minimum voltage, one or more of the cells will reverse bias >and metallic lithium plates out, which is a fire hazard. > >Discharge Full +-- >Curve | \ <--- Store pack, slightly less than full > | \ > Empty + +-- Hibernate - > | \__ > TooLate } \______ CanNotCharge > I think I caught it just before cannot charge. >If you run a laptop so low, that the battery display reads "0%", >the pack voltage is still above the minimum by a bit. If you >drain a laptop, hibernate it, then put it in a closet for three >months, this would be bad, as it could drop to CanNotCharge. >That's why, if putting a laptop away for months on end, you >pull the pack (pack will still "self-discharge"), and ensure the >battery display read about 80% before disassembly. That's how mine >is stored right now - pack out (which runs down the CMOS CR2032 of >course, so that's the tradeoff - CMOS cells are cheaper than packs.) > >The battery management chip inside the pack, could have written >in it by the computer, that the pack has been to the CanNotCharge >voltage and even if you "lifted" the cells individually, it would >not help. If you lifted the pack, artificially above "Empty", >there is no particular reason for the charger to try to refill it. >It reads the battery management chip over the serial bus on the >multi-contact pack connector, and discovers that status bit. > >By reading the serial bus connection to the battery pack, the >log information about pack health can be read by the computer. >Any similar model of machine could read it, and come to the >same conclusion it should not be charged (for safety reasons). > >Now, in a past time, lifting the cells might have worked, because >Battery Management did not babysit the user quite as much. > >Pulling the pack, the laptop should run off the wall adapter. I should have tried that. Panicked I guess. Next time I will think of it. I don't really need to run on the battery unless I want to take the thing to another room without turning it off first, and its good in case of a power failure, although those are rare, >Mine does. Any time you plan on doing a lengthy calc with >a laptop, unplugging the pack avoids attempts to keep >charging the thing, over and over again. Storing the pack >at 80% full makes more sense than keeping a laptop running >constantly with pack in place, and the pack averages 95% to 100% >charge (which is not good for the pack lifetime). I wish there was a way to leave it plugged in but only going to 80%. Phones are the same way. >Back in NiCd days, the batteries functioned as a "regulator", >in really cheaply designed product. Pulling the cells from >such units, could "blow" the laptop. But on modern Lithium Cobalt >systems, the regulation and MOSFET features are such, the laptop >is protected from most user-orchestrated catastrophes. > >Pull pack, plug adapter to laptop, and test it still works. > >No blue charging light is coming on again, until a new pack >is presented to the machine, one above CanNotCharge voltage >and no record in the battery chip, of abuse. > >Make sure that the voltage listed on the adapter, is what >appears on the adapter contacts. On a 19V adapter, the output >voltage should be +/- 0.5V, which means 18.5V is valid and >19.5V is valid. Any value between those two, is close enough >to make it work. "Universal adapters" on occasion, are way >off from the desired value, which is why the magic smoke >comes out a month later. While the third-party manufacturer >claims it is "Universal", the laptop manufacturer made some >assumptions too, about how close the custom adapter >provided, has to be to a "correct voltage" value. If >the laptop expects 19.0V in, the adapter is not allowed to be >too sloppy. IIRC I did buy a replacement, and not factory which was expensive, and it might only be 17v, but it was hard to hold the probes to the plug. Thanks, and thanks Vanguard > Paul