Re: CHKDSK /F
philo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.hardware |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/10/21 4:54 PM, Paul wrote: > philo wrote: >> I have a multi-drive machine and one has an XP drive that I rarely >> use, but still I want it to be in good condition as there is one piece >> of software that will not run on Win10. >> On each boot CHKDSK /F runs and *never* finds a problem. >> >> >> If that drive is in the machine and I run Win10, it too will run >> CHKDSK /F on that XP drive. >> >> >> I suspect the drive itself has some defect so I cloned it to another >> drive. >> >> Though it did run CHKDSK /F the first time, after that it behaved >> normally so I plan to simply set the original drive aside. >> >> Just curious what could be wrong. >> >> I ran the Seagate short test and it found no problems nor had SMART >> been tripped. >> >> >> I am now running the long test. >> >> There is also an option to run an acoustical test. >> What the heck is that? >> >> Might as well run that one too. >> > > I don't rely on the Windows 10 CHKDSK. > > I use the Windows 7 one, as a compromise between > the old and the new. > > Windows 7 CHKDSK tends to dwell (spend too much time on) > XATTR items. It might even be converting something Win10 > specific into the nearest Win7 construct. On a WinXP drive, > I would not expect an excess of strange features, to trip up > the Windows 7 CHKDSK. > > Also, the CHKDSK on the installer DVD (troubleshooting, command > prompt), sometimes that has additional options. You need to > compare versions of CHKDSK for features. A couple of the > features I've located, make no sense, but, the CHKDSK run > does seem to have a different result (more thorough). > > I can't say I've exactly made a science out of this, > as all this version test is a bore. > > Â Â Paul The drive passed all Seagate tests, I am now going to run CHKDSK /F on it from Win7 No matter what, the drive is going to be taken out of service. Thanks