Re: How much latency do you add to torrents?
Oliver <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:36:43 -0600
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy,alt.comp.issues.privacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:59:07 +0100, D <[email protected]> wrote >> But nobody in the USA has ever been convicted of torrenting (there was one >> set of cases which were overturned 'cuz the lawyers lied during the trial). > > Wow! Very interesting. I was not aware of that, so thank you for bringing it up. > I've seen the occasional post on torrentfreak and given the US legal culture I > was absolutely sure of it. The reason is complex but it's simple also in that USA copyright law requires something like half a dozen or more tenets to be satisfied, every single one of which *must* be satisfied in order to be considered infringement. I'm no lawyer so don't bring this thread to your next deposition, but the way I understand it is that the prosecution needs to prove you (and only you - not someone in the house whom they don't know) *distributed* the entire copyrighted movie, in its near entirety, to a person or persons. There are plenty of other tenets which must be fulfilled, but that is the gotcha that explains why there has never been a successful USA case of copyright infringement via torrents (that was fought by the defendant).