Re: AppleScript need: Can a file open at all
Jolly Roger <[email protected]> 20 May 2020 23:10:21 GMT
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.applescript,apple.lists.applescript-users |
|---|---|
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2020-05-20, Tim Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 16, 2020, Jolly Roger wrote > (in article <[email protected]>): > >> On 2020-05-16, Tim Murray<[email protected]> wrote: >> > I recently made a gross error of formatting a disk that had good data on it. >> > (My MBPro was stolen and when I got another, I ended up formatting my Time >> > Machine disk. Aaarrrgh! Some computer tasks should not be performed with >> > bourbon.) Anyway, I ran some recovery programs and got everything back, but >> > there is one issue. >> > >> > My PDFs are all named File0001.pdf, File0002.pdf, and so on, but there are >> > several hundred. Acrobat and Catalina’s Quick Look and Preview can deal >> > with many of them. >> > >> > What I am looking for is a script to run through a folder and determine if a >> > PDF can be opened or even if Quick Look works . . . I don’t need to >> > actually do anything with it, just see if it can be opened. If it cannot, >> > that’s okay: Trash it so that what remains are PDFs can be opened. >> > >> > In a way I don’t really need this per se, because I successfully retrieved >> > most, if not all, the original files that made the PDFs, such as InDesign, >> > Pages, Illustrator, and so on. >> > >> > So can someone here do that? Thanks. >> >> I've done this PDF document validation in Ruby using the pdf-reader Gem >> before. Here's a simplified example script: >> >> --- >> #!/usr/bin/env ruby >> >> require 'pdf-reader' # gem install 'pdf-reader' >> >> class Reader >> def start >> filepath = ARGV[0] >> unless filepath.nil? >> if File.exist?(filepath) >> begin >> reader = PDF::Reader.new(filepath) >> puts "Document is valid: #{File.basename(filepath)}" >> rescue StandardError => exception >> puts "Couldn't open #{File.basename(filepath)}: #{exception.message}" >> end >> else >> STDERR.puts "ERROR: Specified file does not exist: #{filepath}" >> end >> else >> STDERR.puts "ERROR: You must provide the path to a PDF document as the first >> command-line argument." >> end >> end >> end >> >> reader = Reader.new() >> reader.start() >> --- >> >> Usage examples: >> >> --- >> #./pdf_validator.rb ~/Documents/Hardware/Car\ Stereo/Old/KAC818.pdf >> PDF seems valid: KAC818.pdf >> >> # ./pdf_validator.rb some_bad.pdf >> PDF does not contain EOF marker: some_bad.pdf >> --- >> >> You could certainly wrap this in an AppleScript "do shell script" >> command to automate it if you wanted to. But I'd probably just modify >> the script to do exactly what I want and run it on the command line and >> be done with it. > > If I knew something about Ruby (other than just what is “is” I would work > with this, but I don’t. But thanks much. You don't need to know much about Ruby. 1. Copy the script above, paste it into a new text document, named something like pdf_validator.rb. 2. Add this to your ~/.zshrc or ~/.bashrc shell startup file to set the GEM_HOME and GEM_PATH variables so that Ruby Gems are installed in your home directory: # set Ruby gem paths export GEM_HOME=$(ls -t -U | ruby -e 'puts Gem.user_dir') export GEM_PATH=$GEM_HOME export PATH=$PATH:$GEM_HOME/bin 3. To make the GEM_HOME and GEM_PATH changes take effect, open a new terminal window or enter this command from an existing terminal window: source ~/.zshrc -or- source ~/.bashrc 4. Enter this command to validate that there is a path in your home directory for Gems: gem env - you should see something like this: - GEM PATHS: - /Users/jr/.gem/ruby/2.6.0 5. Install the pdf-reader Gem with this command: gem install 'pdf-reader' 6. Test the script manually with something like: ./pdf_validator.rb some.pdf 7. If it works, then you can call the script from the AppleScript "do shell script" command the same way you ran the script manually. There are various command-line PDF tools you might be able to use instead. But having never used one for the purpose of validation, I can't advise you about them. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR