Re: is there a startup script?
Daniel L Newhouse <[email protected]> Wed, 26 May 2021 19:45:49 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.shell.unix.bourne-bash |
|---|---|
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:24:29 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse <[email protected]> wrote: From the OReilly book the bash shell One advantage of bashs ability to look for either synonym is that you can retain your .profile if you have been using the Bourne shell. If you need to add bash-specific commands, you can put them in .bash_profile followed by the command source .profile. When you log in, all the bash-specific commands will be executed, and bash will source .profile, executing the remaining commands. If you decide to switch to using the Bourne shell you dont have to modify your existing files. A similar approach was intended for .bash_login and the C shell .login, but due to differences in the basic syntax of the shells, this is not a good idea. .bash_profile is read and executed only by the login shell. If you start up a new shell (a subshell) by typing bash on the command line, it will attempt to read commands from the file .bashrc. This scheme allows you the flexibility to separate startup commands needed at login time from those you might need when you run a subshell. If you need to have the same commands run regardless of whether it is a login shell or a subshell, you can just use the source command from within .bash_profile to execute .bashrc. If .bashrc doesnt exist then no commands are executed when you start up a subshell. Cameron Newham. Learning the bash Shell (In a Nutshell (O'Reilly)) (pp. 89-90). O'Reilly Media. Kindle Edition. >On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:16:15 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse ><[email protected]> wrote: > >There's another reason to use OpenBSD instead of Darwin. The >nix-Darwin symbol looks like the devil. > >>On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:12:58 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >>Maybe it should be OpenBSD to avoid the Macintosh association. >> >>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:30:06 -0500, "Michael F. Stemper" >>><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>I remember cygwin being more fliexible. Basically, it needs to based >>>on Darwin. Which means it needs to be like a Macintosh. >>> >>>>On 25/03/2021 16.15, Daniel L Newhouse wrote: >>>>> I'm looking through the OReilly book. I'm used to the t-shell. Does >>>>> this shell have a startup script? >>>> >>>>Well, there is ~/.profile, which I mostly use for setting environment >>>>variables. It's only run (as I understand it) for login shells. However, >>>>if you're running in a windowing environment, other windows appear to >>>>inherit all of those variables. >>>> >>>>Then, there is ~/.bashrc, which bash runs for non-login shells. >>>> >>>>There is also ~/.bash_aliases, which is used to set command aliases in >>>>interactive use. My ~/.bashrc conditionally executes it (the condition >>>>being if ~/.bash_aliases exists). I don't think that this is really >>>>a fundamental part of the bash ecosystem.