Re: is there a startup script?

Daniel L Newhouse <[email protected]> Wed, 26 May 2021 19:45:49 -0500
Newsgroups alt.comp.lang.shell.unix.bourne-bash
Organization Forte - www.forteinc.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:24:29 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse
<[email protected]> wrote:

From the OReilly book the bash shell

One advantage of bash’s ability to look for either synonym is that you
can retain your .profile if you have been using the Bourne shell. If
you need to add bash-specific commands, you can put them in
.bash_profile followed by the command source .profile. When you log
in, all the bash-specific commands will be executed, and bash will
source .profile, executing the remaining commands. If you decide to
switch to using the Bourne shell you don’t have to modify your
existing files. A similar approach was intended for .bash_login and
the C shell .login, but due to differences in the basic syntax of the
shells, this is not a good idea. .bash_profile is read and executed
only by the login shell. If you start up a new shell (a subshell) by
typing bash on the command line, it will attempt to read commands from
the file .bashrc. This scheme allows you the flexibility to separate
startup commands needed at login time from those you might need when
you run a subshell. If you need to have the same commands run
regardless of whether it is a login shell or a subshell, you can just
use the source command from within .bash_profile to execute .bashrc.
If .bashrc doesn’t exist then no commands are executed when you start
up a subshell.

Cameron Newham. Learning the bash Shell (In a Nutshell (O'Reilly))
(pp. 89-90). O'Reilly Media. Kindle Edition. 

>On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:16:15 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>There's another reason to use OpenBSD instead of Darwin.  The
>nix-Darwin symbol looks like the devil.  
>
>>On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:12:58 -0500, Daniel L Newhouse
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>Maybe it should be OpenBSD to avoid the Macintosh association.
>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:30:06 -0500, "Michael F. Stemper"
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>I remember cygwin being more fliexible.  Basically, it needs to based
>>>on Darwin.  Which means it needs to be like a Macintosh. 
>>>
>>>>On 25/03/2021 16.15, Daniel L Newhouse wrote:
>>>>> I'm looking through the OReilly book.  I'm used to the t-shell.  Does
>>>>> this shell have a startup script?
>>>>
>>>>Well, there is ~/.profile, which I mostly use for setting environment
>>>>variables. It's only run (as I understand it) for login shells. However,
>>>>if you're running in a windowing environment, other windows appear to
>>>>inherit all of those variables.
>>>>
>>>>Then, there is ~/.bashrc, which bash runs for non-login shells.
>>>>
>>>>There is also ~/.bash_aliases, which is used to set command aliases in
>>>>interactive use. My ~/.bashrc conditionally executes it (the condition
>>>>being if ~/.bash_aliases exists). I don't think that this is really
>>>>a fundamental part of the bash ecosystem.