Re: What IS "Social Media"??
"Carlos E.R." <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Feb 2026 14:34:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-02-06 11:15, Daniel70 wrote: > On 6/02/2026 7:43 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2026-02-05 15:13, s|b wrote: >>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:48:05 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2026-02-01 09:21, Daniel70 wrote: >>> >>>>> Cross-posted to Linux and Win-11 NGs >>>>> >>>>> As may here would be aware, last December, the Australian Government >>>>> brought in Legislation to limit the access to "Social Media" for those >>>>> under 16 years of age. >>>> Spain just announced (in the Dubai Summit) it is going to do the same. >>>> The companies, like X, must actually ensure the age of the person >>>> before >>>> granting access. Method not specified, but clicking somewhere is not >>>> accepted as valid check. >>> 8< snip >8 >>> >>> This is not "to protect the children" as they claim. Children still get >>> access by VPN or even by putting make-up on their face to look older >>> (this is proven to fool the age detection) or by using their parent's >>> account with their approval. >> >> Parents here are asking for this. It is hard to prohibit your kid to >> access the phone, "because all my friends have it". When it is >> prohibited for everybody, it is easier. Nobody has access. > > And, if the Parents then end up with troubled kids, they (the parents) > have no one to blame but themselves. > > "My little Darlings wouldn't do THAT!!" Why would the kids be troubled because not having social media? I didn't have them. Rich people from the California tech valley prohibit their children from being educated with computers and insist on paper. They would know! -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;