Re: Briding Usenet to other social networks?
Daniel70 <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:09:41 +1100
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.linux,alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/02/2026 5:55 am, Frank Slootweg wrote: > J. P. Gilliver <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2026/2/9 1:38:57, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 13:14:32 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >>> >>>> If someone (maybe a student from IT) could write bridges or >>>> gateways to sync Usenet with modern social networks like >>>> Facebook, Threads, Reddit, etc!! It isn't difficult, right? >>>> Because Echomail of Fidonet did it!! :) >>> >>> We already had all that spam crap from Google Groups back when >>> they were gatewaying Usenet, the last thing we need is for the >>> spam crap to return from a new source. >> >> Yes and no; I do agree with what you say, that GG was often a pain. >> But, usenet will die on the vine - I doubt it will make 20 years, >> it might be less than five - unless it gets _some_ new users. > > I'm not too optimistic about the longevity of Usenet either, but the > Death of Usenet has already been proclaimed so many times and there > *are* some young(er) posters. How many former "UseNet" (??) posters thought "UseNet" died the day Google-Groups died .... because THAT was THE only way to post to UseNet?? I know of one of the more numerous posters in one of my other Usenet groups who hasn't been heard of since that day!! > As I mentioned in another thread, one poster in his early twenties > (~25), several from ~42 to ~49 and quite a few to ~70 (including you > :-)) Almost me .... 70 in October!! > So with the ever increasing life expectancy, we still might have 20 > years of Usenet. > > Well, hope springs eternal, doesn't it!? :-) > > [...] -- Daniel70