Re: Tutorial: Notepad++ shortcuts.xml macro converts unicode to the 95-keyboard ASCII characters
"R.Wieser" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.microsoft.windows |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arlen, > Since you deprecate the information I provided No, I didn't. I just pointed out that your use of the word "tutorial" for your premature information is rather overbearing. And thats putting it lightly. I mentioned all that stuff that my cursory scanning of that macro revealed not to "depricate" you, but to show you how much you left in there thats not worthy of a "tutorial" designation. And that includes your *guesses* to what those macro-lines meant. > (which anyone can copy since I always use free software expressly so that > it works for everyone who needs it), You don't need a better method, you need to clean up what you guessed and write about that macro so that its *really* usefull - to the novices you claim to write your tutorials for. > all I ask is for you to add value by showing us a better method. You don't need one. Your method - or better said Notepad++'s one - already works nicely. Its just your explanation/representation of it that needs work. Though I did point out to you that your "tool" wasn't much of one when you still have to do lots of "editor stuff" to get the macro to execute on a file. Was I not allowed to say as much ? Besides, "better" is subjective. Some time ago I wrote a few lines of VBScript to do the same as that macro. One line per replacement, plus a few to load and save the file. I only have to drag-and-drop a file on the script to get it converted. To me its better because I can-and-have expanded on it. I like the freedom to be able to. To you ? Probably not, as you would need to learn something different when you already have something that works. Regards, Rudy Wieser