Re: [OT] decentralized "cloud" storage - Opinions
Soviet_Mario <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:49:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux,alt.comp.os.linux |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/08/22 04:08, Killadebug wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:01:01 +0200, Soviet_Mario wrote: > >> On 17/08/22 02:47, Killadebug wrote: >>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:40:29 +0200, Soviet_Mario wrote: >>> >>>> On 16/08/22 02:56, Killadebug wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:37:32 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Killadebug <[email protected]> writes: re-snip >> >>> Mega allows me to have a realtime syncing which I think is more >>> efficient use of space. >> >> sure ... but you evidently have an efficient internet connection. I just >> have a mobile 150 GB/month connection, also very slow and unstable. > > One other feature Mega has is called file versioning. When a copy of the > file changes locally mega will not overwrite the exisiting file on the > servers, but place the updated copy there also. You can then go back and > restore an earlier copy of a file if you want. > Uhm, now I can recall of another tricky feature that made me flee away many years ago (dunno if it is STILL a drawback), which was : THE FILES NOT BEING USED (edited, downloaded) for more than six months, would be simply deleted. I discovered the thing after having just transferred sth (with mainly backup purpose) and was horrified and ran away. Do you know if NON PAID accounts still suffer from this awful feature or it has been removed ? > I turned that off. > > > -- 1) Resistere, resistere, resistere. 2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti Soviet_Mario - (aka Gatto_Vizzato)