Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc)

On 09/05/23 11:35, vallor wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 14:51:37 +0700, Y. Sputnik wrote:
> 
>> On 05/04/2023 23:53, Sanjay A. Nair wrote:
>>
>>> In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
>>> We should request for one
>>
>> Not request, just _create_.
> 
> (I went down this road last week...)
> 
> comp.ai
> is a moderated newsgroup where you can submit findings
> and observations; and
> comp.ai.shells
> is a group in which you can post your chat logs,
> if that's your thing.  I'd argue that ChatGPT, Bard,
> and DALL-E are "ai shells", and it's appropriate to compare
> them in that group.  Anyway, that's my rational for starting
> to use it, and I'm sticking with it.  You could use it, too.
> 
> (Or not; it's totally up to you. :)    )
> 
> ng's: snecked slightly, since my newsreader has trouble
> with massive crossposts.
> 
> There are more comp.ai groups, maybe one of those would be more suited
> to your liking.  Or there's comp.misc.  I've also seen some AI discussion
> in rec.arts.sf.written.  I wouldn't post an un-annotated chat log in some
> groups though, I've found that to be frowned upon in some circles.
> 
> Finally, I have an article I've been working on for comp.ai.shells
> that compares Bard and ChatGPT:GPT4...
> 


tnx, I've subscribed a few !

-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
MarioCPPP