Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware
Bozo User <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:22:14 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-98se |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-09-27, Renn Datravern <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it correct to assume that a AMD Athlon/Athlon XP machine is period > accurate for Windows 98SE. I built a machine for someone that uses a Athlon > XP 1700+ with Windows 98SE because I didn't have any spare hardware. > > Would this be considered correctly period accurate? I usually try to stick > with Pentium II/III or AMD K6-II. > I ran W98SE under an Athlon 2000 until I switched to GNU/Linux, but w98se ran perfectly well (for its day). Altough I'd set all the w98 updates from https://legacyupdate.net and after it finishes *all* the updates (lots of reboots) I'd put Kernel Ex on top with software like Retrozilla and 7Zip to decompress the hosts file from the last URL: http://piteusz.ovh/files/windows/9x-nt/ http://piteusz.ovh/files/windows/2k/ https://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts2.htm Open the last URL under Retrozilla as it's an HTTPS link.