Re: Booting in Save Mode
Shadow <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Dec 2025 21:11:52 -0300
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-xp |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Shadow |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:44:59 +0100, "R.Wieser" <[email protected]> wrote: >John > >> www.startpage.com also seems to be cleaner than Google and >> less trackier. > >Last year(?) they switched over to a JavaScript driven website*, which >doesn't directly signal clean-and-trustworthy to me (hard to keep track of >what JS is doing). > >To bad though, before that it worked quite well for me. > >* if anyone knows how to do an non-JS connection I would like to hear about >it. +1 I removed Startpage from my favorites when it started demanding I allow javascript. "to get to know me better". There is absolutely no reason to use scripting. Classic htm will submit any user's queries to the search engine. Any user's comments can be captired too. []'s // <https://support.startpage.com/hc/en-us/articles/4455571405204-Why-are-we-requiring-users-to-enable-JavaScript> Why are we requiring users to enable JavaScript? July 05, 2022 09:36 Updated Startpage relies on JavaScript to make our pages and features functional. WeÂre constantly keeping the site up to date with the best UX and the most modern tech stack, which requires us to utilize JavaScript. // I have no idea what "tech stack" means. Datamining? Stealing information? WTF is an "UX" ? -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Google Fuchsia - 2021