Re: why graphical screenshot? from a command prompt console window?
Paul <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Feb 2026 12:56:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.msdos.batch.nt |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2/17/2026 8:07 PM, Char Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 05:43:40 -0500, Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2/17/2026 5:01 AM, R.Wieser wrote: >>> Mr. Man-wai Chang, >>> >>>> But that's a different newsgroup. Not a good idea in terms of discussion. >>> >>> And uploading a file to another, completely unrelated server is better ? :-p >>> >>> But yes, people would need to be aware that responding to the post with the >>> attachment would do little good. Just like an uploader would need to be >>> aware that file servers have their own rules and hurdles (cough, javascript, >>> cough) for anyone wanting to take a peek at their upload. >>> >>>> You also need a way to tell others to go that newsgroup to see the image >>>> by what, message-id? :) >>> >>> Thats the same problem as with those image/file servers. >>> >>> I could imagine prefixing the name of image with the subject of the thread >>> its referred from. Perhaps with the posters name appended. Or even just >>> the posters name. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rudy Wieser >> >> The M-ID would work, but only for M-ID enabled News Clients. >> Betterbird or Thunderbird, may be about to gain this function. > > I assume you mean natively. Yes, a native method. Betterbird Portable 140.7.1esr-bb18 (64-bit) betterbirdlauncher "mid:[email protected]" Somehow, it knows which server out of six in my list to use. On purpose, I "selected" a non-functional server, to try to confuse it, and eventually it still opened a window on the server where the message exists. Whether it is doing this, via searching all the Mork Summary Files .msf, I don't know. It might mean, that one of the requirements would be for the user to have all their server message lists up-to-date. My first concern, was of the MID URI design. I figured it should have the server name, followed by a MID string. But the above syntax worked. It worked on that example. I did NOT (so far), see a menu item added for this. It likely would work with a MID buried in a message, so we should leave one here later for test. If this feature was working well, I should be able to click one of these that looks sufficiently like a URI and a separate tab should open after you actuate it. <[email protected]> mid:[email protected] And maybe one of those strings will work. We'll see. Paul