Coke
Yelena Simington <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Dec 2023 20:43:17 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The unqualified term "coke" usually refers to the product derived from low-= ash and low-sulphur bituminous coal by a process called coking. A similar p= roduct called petroleum coke, or pet coke, is obtained from crude oil in oi= l refineries. Coke may also be formed naturally by geologic processes.[1] Historical sources dating to the 4th century describe the production of cok= e in ancient China.[2] The Chinese first used coke for heating and cooking = no later than the 9th century.[citation needed] By the first decades of the= 11th century, Chinese ironworkers in the Yellow River valley began to fuel= their furnaces with coke, solving their fuel problem in that tree-sparse r= egion.[3] coke Download https://terpturpropki.blogspot.com/?zn=3D2wJ3Pf China is the largest producer and exporter of coke today.[4] China produces= 60% of the world's coke. Concerns about air pollution have motivated techn= ological changes in the coke industry by elimination of outdated coking tec= hnologies that are not energy-efficient.[5] In 1589, a patent was granted to Thomas Proctor and William Peterson for ma= king iron and steel and melting lead with "earth-coal, sea-coal, turf, and = peat". The patent contains a distinct allusion to the preparation of coal b= y "cooking". In 1590, a patent was granted to the Dean of York to "purify p= it-coal and free it from its offensive smell".[6] In 1620, a patent was gra= nted to a company composed of William St. John and other knights, mentionin= g the use of coke in smelting ores and manufacturing metals. In 1627, a pat= ent was granted to Sir John Hacket and Octavius de Strada for a method of r= endering sea-coal and pit-coal as useful as charcoal for burning in houses,= without offence by smell or smoke.[7] In 1709, Abraham Darby I established a coke-fired blast furnace to produce = cast iron. Coke's superior crushing strength allowed blast furnaces to beco= me taller and larger. The ensuing availability of inexpensive iron was one = of the factors leading to the Industrial Revolution. Before this time, iron= -making used large quantities of charcoal, produced by burning wood. As the= coppicing of forests became unable to meet the demand, the substitution of= coke for charcoal became common in Great Britain, and coke was manufacture= d by burning coal in heaps on the ground so that only the outer layer burne= d, leaving the interior of the pile in a carbonized state. In the late 18th= century, brick beehive ovens were developed, which allowed more control ov= er the burning process.[9] In 1768, John Wilkinson built a more practical oven for converting coal int= o coke.[10] Wilkinson improved the process by building the coal heaps aroun= d a low central chimney built of loose bricks and with openings for the com= bustion gases to enter, resulting in a higher yield of better coke. With gr= eater skill in the firing, covering and quenching of the heaps, yields were= increased from about 33% to 65% by the middle of the 19th century. The Sco= ttish iron industry expanded rapidly in the second quarter of the 19th cent= ury, through the adoption of the hot-blast process in its coalfields.[11] In 1802, a battery of beehive ovens was set up near Sheffield, to coke the = Silkstone coal seam for use in crucible steel melting. By 1870, there were = 14,000 beehive ovens in operation on the West Durham coalfields, producing = 4,000,000 long tons of coke per year. As a measure of the expansion of coke= making, the requirements of the iron industry in Britain were about 1,000,= 000 tons per year in the early 1850s, rising to about 7,000,000 tons by 188= 0. Of these, about 5,000,000 tons were produced in Durham county, 1,000,000= tons in the South Wales coalfield, and 1,000,000 tons in Yorkshire and Der= byshire.[11] In the first years of steam locomotives, coke was the normal fuel. This res= ulted from an early piece of environmental legislation; any proposed locomo= tive had to "consume its own smoke".[12] This was not technically possible = to achieve until the firebox arch came into use, but burning coke, with its= low smoke emissions, was considered to meet the requirement. This rule was= quietly dropped, and cheaper coal became the normal fuel, as railways gain= ed acceptance among the public. The smoke plume produced by a travelling lo= comotive seems now to be a mark of a steam railway, and so preserved for po= sterity. So-called "gas works" produced coke by heating coal in enclosed chambers. T= he flammable gas that was given off was stored in gas holders, to be used d= omestically and industrially for cooking, heating and lighting. The gas was= commonly known as "town gas" since underground networks of pipes ran throu= gh most towns. It was replaced by "natural gas" (initially from the North S= ea oil and gas fields) in the decade after 1967.[citation needed] Other byp= roducts of coke production included tar and ammonia, while the coke was use= d instead of coal in cooking ranges and to provide heat in domestic premise= s before the advent of central heating. In the US, the first use of coke in an iron furnace occurred around 1817 at= Isaac Meason's Plumsock puddling furnace and rolling mill in Fayette Count= y, Pennsylvania.[13] In the late 19th century, the coalfields of western Pe= nnsylvania provided a rich source of raw material for coking. In 1885, the = Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal and Iron Company[14] constructed the world's = longest string of coke ovens in Walston, Pennsylvania, with 475 ovens over = a length of 2 km (1.25 miles). Their output reached 22,000 tons per month. = The Minersville Coke Ovens in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, were listed = on the National Register of Historic Places in 1991.[15] Between 1870 and 1905, the number of beehive ovens in the US increased from= approximately 200 to nearly 31,000, which produced nearly 18,000,000 tons = of coke in the Pittsburgh area alone.[16] One observer boasted that if load= ed into a train, "the year's production would make up a train so long that = the engine in front of it would go to San Francisco and come back to Connel= lsville before the caboose had gotten started out of the Connellsville yard= s!" The number of beehive ovens in Pittsburgh peaked in 1910 at almost 48,0= 00.[17] Although it made a top-quality fuel, coking poisoned the surrounding landsc= ape. After 1900, the serious environmental damage of beehive coking attract= ed national notice, although the damage had plagued the district for decade= s. "The smoke and gas from some ovens destroy all vegetation around the sma= ll mining communities", noted W. J. Lauck of the U.S. Immigration Commissio= n in 1911.[18] Passing through the region on train, University of Wisconsin= president Charles Van Hise saw "long rows of beehive ovens from which flam= e is bursting and dense clouds of smoke issuing, making the sky dark. By ni= ght the scene is rendered indescribably vivid by these numerous burning pit= s. The beehive ovens make the entire region of coke manufacture one of dull= ed sky: cheerless and unhealthful."[18] Bituminous coal must meet a set of criteria for use as coking coal, determi= ned by particular coal assay techniques. These include moisture content, as= h content, sulphur content, volatile content, tar, and plasticity. This ble= nding is targeted at producing a coke of appropriate strength (generally me= asured by coke strength after reaction), while losing an appropriate amount= of mass. Other blending considerations include ensuring the coke doesn't s= well too much during production and destroy the coke oven through excessive= wall pressures. The "hearth" process of coke-making, using lump coal, was akin to that of c= harcoal-burning; instead of a heap of prepared wood, covered with twigs, le= aves and earth, there was a heap of coals, covered with coke dust. The hear= th process continued to be used in many areas during the first half of the = 19th century, but two events greatly lessened its importance. These were th= e invention of the hot blast in iron-smelting and the introduction of the b= eehive coke oven. The use of a blast of hot air, instead of cold air, in th= e smelting furnace was first introduced by Neilson in Scotland in 1828.[11]= The hearth process of making coke from coal is a very lengthy process.[cita= tion needed] A fire brick chamber shaped like a dome is used, commonly known as a beehiv= e oven. It is typically 4 meters (13.1 ft) wide and 2.5 meters (8.2 ft) hig= h. The roof has a hole for charging the coal or other kindling from the top= . The discharging hole is provided in the circumference of the lower part o= f the wall. In a coke oven battery, a number of ovens are built in a row wi= th common walls between neighboring ovens. A battery consisted of a great m= any ovens, sometimes hundreds, in a row.[23] Coal is introduced from the top to produce an even layer of about 60 to 90 = centimeters (24 to 35 in) deep. Air is supplied initially to ignite the coa= l. Carbonization starts and produces volatile matter, which burns inside th= e partially closed side door. Carbonization proceeds from top to bottom and= is completed in two to three days. Heat is supplied by the burning volatil= e matter so no by-products are recovered. The exhaust gases are allowed to = escape to the atmosphere. The hot coke is quenched with water and discharge= d, manually through the side door. The walls and roof retain enough heat to= initiate carbonization of the next charge. When coal was burned in a coke oven, the impurities of the coal not already= driven off as gases accumulated to form slag, which was effectively a cong= lomeration of the removed impurities. Since it was not the desired coke pro= duct, slag was initially nothing more than an unwanted by-product and was d= iscarded. Later, however, it was found to have many beneficial uses and has= since been used as an ingredient in brick-making, mixed cement, granule-co= vered shingles, and even as a fertilizer.[24] People can be exposed to coke oven emissions in the workplace by inhalation= , skin contact, or eye contact. The Occupational Safety and Health Administ= ration (OSHA) has set the legal limit for coke oven emissions exposure in t= he workplace as 0.150 mg/m3 benzene-soluble fraction over an eight-hour wor= kday. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has= set a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 0.2 mg/m3 benzene-soluble fracti= on over an eight-hour workday.[25] eebf2c3492