Re: Menu Bar

Ken Blake <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.financial.quicken
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 13:58:22 -0800 (PST), John Pollard
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 2:11:46 PM UTC-6, Ken Blake wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:59:07 -0800 (PST), John Pollard wrote:
>
>> >Did you make sure Quicken could not access the internet during that install?
>
>> No, I forgot to. Was that important? If so, I'll try it again, probably tomorrow.
>
>Normally, for the purpose were discussing here: Yes.
>
>The idea is to get rid of your currently installed version (release) of Quicken 
>(that's the uninstall part), then install an older version (release) of Quicken.
>You want a release that is old enough so what ever patch file you want to apply 
>will work. If, for example, you were to re-install the same version (release) of Quicken 
>that you previously had, you would not be able to patch to the current release. So, for 
>example; if you have R44.7 installed and you run the patch file for R44.7, nothing will happen.
>
>One of the purposes of that exercise is to insure that the release you end up with is installed 
>by the downloaded patch file, NOT installed automatically by Quicken. Sometimes that auto-install 
>process creates a problem, and sometimes that problem can be corrected by reverting to an 
>earlier release, then running the Mondo patch file (for R44.7), that Mondo patch file would be
>named QW27.1.47.7MPatch.EXE (where the M stands for Mondo). When Quicken upgrades the 
>release automatically, I do not believe it uses a Mondo patch.
>
>> >If you could not access the Menu items after that recent install, 
>> >right-click the downloaded Quicken.exe install file, choose Properties > Details. 
>> >What "Product version" is displayed?
>
>> 27.1.44.28. 
>
>> An old version, 
>
>Yes, and just what you want, if you are intending to upgrade to release R47.7 
>(or any release later than 44.28)
>
>> so even thought I didn't disconnect the 
>> Internet, it apparently didn't do an update . 
>
>I agree. Preventing Quicken from accessing the internet during the install process 
>is just intended to guarantee that no auto-update takes place.

OK, so even though I didn't do it, it's OK?


>
>> Should I do an update now?
>
>If you now have R44.28 installed, and you have not already tested it to see whether
>it exhibits the same problem we're discussing; you should do that first.  

Yes, same problem.


>And if you've already tried using R44.28 with your regular Quicken data file, and you're 
>seeing the same problem, there's still another test you can do. 

>Try using a Quicken data file that has never been opened in the release 
>where you first experienced the problem - presumably R44.7.

You mean 47.7?

>To find such a file, look for the most current backup you know has never been exposed to R44.7; 
>make a Windows copy of that backup in some Windows folder 
>where it will never get confused as a file you want to use regularly. 
>Rename the copied file to remove the "-backup" from the file name (making it 
>indistinguishable from a regular Quicken file). 
>Then open that copied/renamed file with R44.28 to see whether the problem still exists. 

OK, I'll see what I can do (maybe tomorrow)


>Presumably that file will have no corruption - however, I would also consider that you 
>may have had some relatively minor corruption in your file for some time, 
>and that when R47.7 started using that data, it turned minor (previously unexperienced) 
>corruption into more serious corruption.

I suppose that's possible, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

>In any event, at the end of the day, the idea is
>1.) To try to determine whether R47.7 caused the problem, though 
>I think the best we might conclude is a maybe yes or maybe no. 
>2.) To try to find a Quicken release that will not exhibit the Menu problem that
>you can run until a better idea comes along.
>
>Also note: there are quite a few Quicken releases that are newer than R44.28, yet 
>older than R47.7. If R47.7 was the source of your problem, any of those intermediate 
>releases might work, and might be better than R44.28. There should be patch files for
>all those releases at the quicknperlwiz site you used previously.


Sounds like a lot of work to try them all, and I don't expect any of
them to work, but I'll see what I can do.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.