Re: Menu Bar
Ken Blake <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.financial.quicken |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 13:58:22 -0800 (PST), John Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: >On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 2:11:46 PM UTC-6, Ken Blake wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:59:07 -0800 (PST), John Pollard wrote: > >> >Did you make sure Quicken could not access the internet during that install? > >> No, I forgot to. Was that important? If so, I'll try it again, probably tomorrow. > >Normally, for the purpose were discussing here: Yes. > >The idea is to get rid of your currently installed version (release) of Quicken >(that's the uninstall part), then install an older version (release) of Quicken. >You want a release that is old enough so what ever patch file you want to apply >will work. If, for example, you were to re-install the same version (release) of Quicken >that you previously had, you would not be able to patch to the current release. So, for >example; if you have R44.7 installed and you run the patch file for R44.7, nothing will happen. > >One of the purposes of that exercise is to insure that the release you end up with is installed >by the downloaded patch file, NOT installed automatically by Quicken. Sometimes that auto-install >process creates a problem, and sometimes that problem can be corrected by reverting to an >earlier release, then running the Mondo patch file (for R44.7), that Mondo patch file would be >named QW27.1.47.7MPatch.EXE (where the M stands for Mondo). When Quicken upgrades the >release automatically, I do not believe it uses a Mondo patch. > >> >If you could not access the Menu items after that recent install, >> >right-click the downloaded Quicken.exe install file, choose Properties > Details. >> >What "Product version" is displayed? > >> 27.1.44.28. > >> An old version, > >Yes, and just what you want, if you are intending to upgrade to release R47.7 >(or any release later than 44.28) > >> so even thought I didn't disconnect the >> Internet, it apparently didn't do an update . > >I agree. Preventing Quicken from accessing the internet during the install process >is just intended to guarantee that no auto-update takes place. OK, so even though I didn't do it, it's OK? > >> Should I do an update now? > >If you now have R44.28 installed, and you have not already tested it to see whether >it exhibits the same problem we're discussing; you should do that first. Yes, same problem. >And if you've already tried using R44.28 with your regular Quicken data file, and you're >seeing the same problem, there's still another test you can do. >Try using a Quicken data file that has never been opened in the release >where you first experienced the problem - presumably R44.7. You mean 47.7? >To find such a file, look for the most current backup you know has never been exposed to R44.7; >make a Windows copy of that backup in some Windows folder >where it will never get confused as a file you want to use regularly. >Rename the copied file to remove the "-backup" from the file name (making it >indistinguishable from a regular Quicken file). >Then open that copied/renamed file with R44.28 to see whether the problem still exists. OK, I'll see what I can do (maybe tomorrow) >Presumably that file will have no corruption - however, I would also consider that you >may have had some relatively minor corruption in your file for some time, >and that when R47.7 started using that data, it turned minor (previously unexperienced) >corruption into more serious corruption. I suppose that's possible, but it doesn't seem likely to me. >In any event, at the end of the day, the idea is >1.) To try to determine whether R47.7 caused the problem, though >I think the best we might conclude is a maybe yes or maybe no. >2.) To try to find a Quicken release that will not exhibit the Menu problem that >you can run until a better idea comes along. > >Also note: there are quite a few Quicken releases that are newer than R44.28, yet >older than R47.7. If R47.7 was the source of your problem, any of those intermediate >releases might work, and might be better than R44.28. There should be patch files for >all those releases at the quicknperlwiz site you used previously. Sounds like a lot of work to try them all, and I don't expect any of them to work, but I'll see what I can do.