Re: Dupliicate check #s
Kobac <slatus@*delete_this_part_to_reply*optonline.net>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.financial.quicken |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/25/2023 10:34, Andrew wrote: > On 6/25/2023 10:11 AM, Kobac wrote: >> I send almost all of my payments via the payee's own website. > > That's most interesting. I would think that would take a lot of time > and effort, since I know each site's panels to do so are unique. I have > about 55 active vendors in my electronic paylist via my CUs electronic > check system, so to pay each of those uniquely would be very burdensome > to me. > > But I do appreciate what you are saying about a bad situation you had in > the past. I recall I might have had a payment missed or something to > that effect, but it very rarely occurs and I'm willing to take that risk > personally. > > I try never to argue with how someone manages their finances in the > electronic format. Unless of course people enter a split payment when > paying a credit card to record categories in a Quicken register! :-) 55 vendors? Wow. I have maybe 15 or so. Most of my transactions go through my credit cards so that's why I have so few to pay—I just pay the credit card and it takes care of them all in one fell swoop. I record each credit card charge separately on the day of the charge because I like to keep track of when the charge was made, not when the credit card bill is paid. The snafu I had was a long time ago and it was with Checkfree through Intuit. This was in the early days of electronic payments and some of the vendors did not process them in a timely fashion—some big companies too like Marine Midland and Capital One (the one I had the worst problem with). As a consequence, I incurred numerous late charges, which I protested. Most of them I got reversed. After writing letters and making phone calls, I got tired of the hassle and canceled the service. This was all back in the late 90s.