Re: Quicken file size - should I reduce?
JohnSmith <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:06:27 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.financial.quicken |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arthur Conan Doyle said > JohnSmith <[email protected]> wrote: > >>It appears the slowness I'm experiencing is due to Satellite >>internet. >> >>When I utilize my phone as a hotspot (for my PC) Quicken runs quite a >>bit faster. I figure it's due to the looong ping times I experience >>when using the satellite. >>(650ms on sat verses 41ms on phone hotspot. <gasp> :-) > > You may wish to consider switching to Starlink. Median latency is > 60ms right now, with plans to cut that to 30ms or less. > > https://www.pcmag.com/news/spacex-tries-again-to-reduce-starlink-laten > cy-to-under-20-milliseconds Very interesting. Do you have any experience with Startlink? (This must be why ViaSat just drastically cut their costs. Finally some competition!) > -- > Usenet: The world's first (and best) social network. > I miss the old days of USENET. Much better platform for information than forums, Facebutt, etc. :-)