Re: Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook Is A Careless Wanker

Go deface and purge CityxGuide.com, Backpage.com, and 1backpage.com. Becaus=
e they waste of electricity kirjutas laup=C3=A4ev, 10. aprill 2021 kl 01:35=
:50 UTC+3:
> 533 million Facebook users' phone numbers and personal data have been lea=
ked=20
> The personal data of over 500 million Facebook users has been posted onli=
ne=20
> in a low-level hacking forum.=20
> The data includes phone numbers, full names, location, email address, and=
=20
> biographical information.=20
>=20
> =C2=BBwww.businessinsider.com/ =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 e-2021-4=20
>=20
> A user in a low level hacking forum has published the phone numbers and=
=20
> personal data of hundreds of millions of Facebook users for free online.=
=20
>=20
> The exposed data includes personal information of over 533 million Facebo=
ok=20
> users from 106 countries, including over 32 million records on users in t=
he=20
> US, 11 million on users in the UK, and 6 million on users in India. It=20
> includes their phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations,=20
> birthdates, bios, and =E2=80=94 in some cases =E2=80=94 email addresses.=
=20
>=20
> Insider reviewed a sample of the leaked data and verified several records=
 by=20
> matching known Facebook users' phone numbers with the IDs listed in the d=
ata=20
> set. We also verified records by testing email addresses from the data se=
t=20
> in Facebook's password reset feature, which can be used to partially reve=
al=20
> a user's phone number.=20
>=20
> The leaked data could provide valuable information to cybercriminals who =
use=20
> people's personal information to impersonate them or scam them into handi=
ng=20
> over login credentials, according to Alon Gal, CTO of cybercrime=20
> intelligence firm Hudson Rock, who first discovered the leaked data on=20
> Saturday.=20
>=20
> "A database of that size containing the private information such as phone=
=20
> numbers of a lot of Facebook's users would certainly lead to bad actors=
=20
> taking advantage of the data to perform social engineering attacks [or]=
=20
> hacking attempts," Gal told Insider.=20
>=20
> Facebook did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment.=20
> ---=20
> edit: FTA "Individuals signing up to a reputable company like Facebook...=
"=20
> Muffled guffaws=20
> +10 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 1:30 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> woody7=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2000-10-13=20
> Torrance, CA=20
> that is why I don't do social media................/=20
> +9 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 1:46 pm =C2=B7=20
> lawsoncl=20
> join:2008-10-28=20
> Spirit Lake, ID=20
> to Shamayim=20
> Is Facebook just upset that they didn't get paid for selling the info?=20
> +19 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 2:33 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> vaxvms=20
> ferroequine fan=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2005-03-01=20
> Wormtown=20
> =C2=B7Charter=20
> to Shamayim=20
> You forgot to include this=20
> quote:=20
> A Facebook spokesperson told Insider that the data was scraped due to a=
=20
> vulnerability that the company patched in 2019.=20
>=20
> While a couple of years old, the leaked data could provide valuable=20
> information to cybercriminals who use people's personal information to=20
> impersonate them or scam them into handing over login credentials,=20
> +5 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 4:14 pm =C2=B7=20
> InternetJeff=20
> I'm your huckleberry.=20
> join:2001-09-25=20
> .=20
> to Shamayim=20
> Reason# 533,000,000 not to be attached to the Zuckerborg network.=20
> +10 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 4:19 pm =C2=B7=20
> cramer=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2007-04-10=20
> Raleigh, NC=20
> to Shamayim=20
> What idiot tells facebook anything that isn't public knowledge? (i.e. stu=
ff=20
> facebook already knows)=20
> +6 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 5:25 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> Shamayim=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2002-09-23=20
> I dunno. 500 million? (Rough estimate).=20
> +6 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 6:48 pm =C2=B7=20
> Shady Bimmer=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2001-12-03=20
> to cramer=20
> said by cramer:=20
> What idiot tells facebook anything that isn't public knowledge? (i.e. stu=
ff=20
> facebook already knows)=20
>=20
> said by Shamayim:=20
> I dunno. 500 million? (Rough estimate).=20
>=20
> I didn't see anything to suggest that everything exposed was previously=
=20
> necessarily private. It is very possible (likely) that the data exposed w=
as=20
> already "public".=20
>=20
> There are those that do drink the koolaid and believe that the PII they=
=20
> provide is indeed truly kept secure and private. Then again they're also=
=20
> likely to have provided that same detail to others=20
> (sites/networks/logins/etc) which negates at least somewhat any "privacy"=
.=20
>=20
> It is possible to use a separate (otherwise dedicated) email just for soc=
ial=20
> networks, public forums, etc. Similarly it is possible to use google voic=
e=20
> (or similar) for phone numbers on services that so require it, keeping on=
e's=20
> personal cell actually still "private" (note the quotes)=20
>=20
> Whether or not individuals choose to take their own privacy seriously is =
a=20
> different question. If privacy isn't taken seriously by the individual th=
en=20
> such "breaches" likely won't expose information that hasn't already been=
=20
> voluntarily provided exposed previously.=20
>=20
> If you have a mobile device then using a social network such as FB doesn'=
t=20
> really compromise your privacy significantly further. If you believe that=
=20
> your mobile provider is somehow that much better regarding privacy than=
=20
> social networks, then you may be in for a bit of an awakening.=20
> +4 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 7:29 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> mackey=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2007-08-20=20
> said by Shady Bimmer:=20
> If you have a mobile device then using a social network such as FB doesn'=
t=20
> really compromise your privacy significantly further. If you believe that=
=20
> your mobile provider is somehow that much better regarding privacy than=
=20
> social networks, then you may be in for a bit of an awakening.=20
>=20
> What, exactly, are they selling and to whom are they selling it? I don't=
=20
> get anywhere near enough junk calls to believe my provider sells my info.=
=20
> Perhaps you're confusing them with app makers who slurp everything and se=
ll=20
> it to everyone+dog?=20
> =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 8:16 pm =C2=B7=20
> Shady Bimmer=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2001-12-03=20
> It isn't all about getting "junk calls". In fact actual phone calls would=
=20
> likely have very little to do with even social media and have much more t=
o=20
> do with robocalls.=20
>=20
> It is all about tracking, and the detail sold by mobile providers is an=
=20
> important piece of all the other data that is collected.=20
>=20
> Also don't forget that aside from your mobile provider the vendor for you=
r=20
> phone that provides the OS and obligatory bundled apps also collects=20
> significant data. That primarily amounts to either Apple or Google (which=
=20
> provides the android OS).=20
>=20
> Apple and Google both acknowledge that they do collect data, but both als=
o=20
> try to qualify that collection ("only for diagnostic", "anonymous", "only=
=20
> when needed", etc), Their claims aren't any different than those of socia=
l=20
> media, but yet other media outlets focus on their competitors much more=
=20
> significantly (gee, I wonder why?)=20
>=20
> It is interesting to note how most will complain about privacy when it=20
> involves something that won't have a personal impact. Raise a point about=
=20
> something that does have a personal impact and they'll immediately jump o=
n=20
> the defensive.=20
>=20
> As another data point: Have you ever tried to use a phone number as part =
of=20
> proving your identity only to have it rejected since the name on the acco=
unt=20
> for the phone doesn't match the name you are trying to register? Sending=
=20
> texts to the phone are only to prove that the phone is in your possession=
,=20
> to further validate the name/number match.=20
>=20
> Nothing is as simple or innocent as it may seem.=20
> +2 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 9:10 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> mackey=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2007-08-20=20
> said by Shady Bimmer:=20
> Have you ever tried to use a phone number as part of proving your identit=
y=20
> only to have it rejected since the name on the account for the phone does=
n't=20
> match the name you are trying to register?=20
>=20
> No, I can't say I have ever used my phone as proof of identity. Wouldn't=
=20
> work either as both my phone and internet are under pseudonyms.=20
> +6 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-3 10:20 pm =C2=B7=20
> hardly=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2004-02-10=20
> USA=20
> (Software) pfSense=20
> Asus RT-AC68=20
> Netgear CM600=20
> said by mackey:=20
> Wouldn't work either as both my phone and internet are under pseudonyms.=
=20
>=20
> Really?=20
> You mean that your name actually is not Wolfgang Mozart?=20
> +3 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-4 3:47 am =C2=B7=20
> HELLFIRE=20
> MVM=20
> join:2009-11-25=20
> to Shamayim=20
> Facebook, our knight in shining armor, defender of our privacy and securi=
ty!=20
> [/extreme malice and sarcasm]=20
>=20
> I don't expect much in the way of consequences this side of the Atlantic,=
=20
> but I hope GDPR has a bigger bite...=20
>=20
> Regards=20
> +6 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-4 11:40 am =C2=B7=20
> HELLFIRE=20
> to Shamayim=20
> =C2=BBhaveibeenzucked.com/ -- this is new to me, but fairly simple to use=
 and=20
> check if your Facebook info leaked...=20
>=20
> Regards=20
> +6 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-5 5:58 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> Unbundled=20
> But When ? ?=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2010-09-13=20
> Irving, TX=20
> to Shamayim=20
> I never shared my phone # with FB. I signed up with a very obscure email=
=20
> address.=20
> +2 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 2021-Apr-7 8:04 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> ashrc4=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2009-02-06=20
> australia=20
> to HELLFIRE=20
> said by HELLFIRE:=20
> =C2=BBhaveibeenzucked.com/ -- this is new to me, but fairly simple to use=
 and=20
> check if your Facebook info leaked...=20
>=20
> Regards=20
>=20
> Have I been pwned also now has added the list.=20
>=20
> =C2=BBhaveibeenpwned.com/=20
> Click for full size=20
>=20
> They got my cell no. but not the email.=20
> P.s. only 2.5million email addresses were stolen out of the half a billio=
n=20
> phone no.s.=20
> +5 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 Yesterday 5:34 am =C2=B7=20
>=20
> Unbundled=20
> But When ? ?=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2010-09-13=20
> Irving, TX=20
> said by ashrc4:=20
> P.s. only 2.5million email addresses were stolen out of the half a billio=
n=20
> phone no.s.=20
>=20
> Yeah, the % of the # of emails gotten was just .005, so no biggie!!!=20
> =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 Yesterday 2:53 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> ashrc4=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2009-02-06=20
> australia=20
> to Shamayim=20
> Well this is confusing to say the least.=20
> Click for full size=20
>=20
>=20
> My phone no is pawned on one and not the other.=20
> +2 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 Yesterday 8:40 pm =C2=B7=20
>=20
> antdude=20
> ANTh Vader=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2001-03-25=20
> US=20
> to Shamayim=20
> Are these web sites trust worthy to enter our e-mail addresses and phone=
=20
> numbers to check? :P=20
> +2 =C2=B7 actions =C2=B7 Today 1:13 am =C2=B7=20
>=20
> ashrc4=20
> Premium Member=20
> join:2009-02-06=20
> australia=20
> 1 edit=20
> said by antdude:=20
> Are these web sites trust worthy to enter our e-mail addresses and phone=
=20
> numbers to check? :P=20
>=20
> Have I been zucked.com seems to store your tries in a cookie. Closing the=
=20
> tab and returning the tries remain persistent. It also has no privacy=20
> link/statement either.=20
>=20
> The link to haveibeenpwned privacy statement.

Hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa


I believe he is a caring wanker !










I