Re: can't get LibreOffice to run on XP Pro SP3
James Wobanwu <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:53:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.computer |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/30/21 10:45 PM, VanguardLH wrote: > James Wobanwu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have an old Toshiba Pentium II with XP Pro SP3 and I am trying to get >> LibreOffice to run on it. I have downloaded the last versions of LO, >> which appears to be 5.4, that will run on XP. I have tried both >> portable and non-portable versions. No error messages, just when I >> click on LO, the hard drive starts to churn and then stops after a while >> and the program doesn't open. I even tried a 5.3.X version but same >> behavior. Any help here would be welcome and thanks. > > If the program started to load but crashed, there might be an entry in > Event Viewer's logs about the program's crash. No crash, it just won't start. > > At https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/, on > which hyperlink did you click? There is no 5.4 version in the archive, > but there are many 5.4.x versions. Under which one did you go? If you > went under: > > https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/5.4.7.2/ > > and then under the win subfolder, which bitwidth did you choose for the > download? There is no 64-bit version of Windows XP. (*) > > (*) What was called Windows XP x64 was a crippled version of Windows > Server 2003 with a Windows XP desktop GUI. If not designed to run > under a server version of Windows, a program may not run. Windows > XP x64 is bogus, and Microsoft's attempt to glom onto the burgeoning > 64-bit consumer demand along with a shammed attempt to catch up with > other 64-bit operating systems. A program that won't run under a > server edition of Windows may also not run under the sham named > Windows XP x64. 32 bit. > > Ouch, a really old Pentium 2 (launched back in 1997). That's a painful > struggle. Is that the one with Slot2 processors? Those slid into a > slot, not socket, had tangs to hold it into the motherboard slot, and > put a lot of stress on the slot and mobo due to its weight; see > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slot_2. Are you prepping it for donation > to the Smithsonian museum? No, using as a simple data logger. Had been running Win ME on it until wanting to try out a program that needed XP or higher, so installed XP recently. Doesn't do well with XP having only 64 MB Ram. No need to spend on a new one when all I'm doing is logging and *perhaps* graphing with LO. If I can't get LO to work so I can graph, I will use one of my other, much newer PC's. > > SSE extensions weren't available until the Pentium 3. Because of SSE, > you sure LO 5.4.x doesn't have a minimum hardware requirement of a > Pentium 3 CPU? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_SIMD_Extensions > > Version 5.4.x required the Microsoft Visual C++ 2015 runtime libs. LO > doesn't include those. Do you have them? > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/the-latest-supported-visual-c-downloads-2647da03-1eea-4433-9aff-95f26a218cc0 Tried to install MV C++ 2015 and it wouldn't install, got some sort of error message. >