Re: Proposal - alt.comp.os.windows-11

In article <[email protected]>
"Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> >Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>that by tradition, there is a one-week comment period. Maybe he'll change
> >>the group name. Maybe he'll decide to wait till there's an actual product
> >>released into the marketplace that users can discuss.
>
> >You are right Adam, we already have these:
>
> >alt.comp.os.windows-me
> >alt.comp.os.windows-95
> >alt.comp.os.windows-98
> >alt.comp.os.windows-98se
> >alt.comp.os.windows-xp
> >alt.comp.os.windows-8
> >alt.comp.os.windows-10
>
> >So how about alt.comp.os.windows-eleven
>
> >or
>
> >alt.comp.os.windows-20.minus.9
>
> >or
>
> >alt.comp.os.windows-square.root.of.121
>
> >Any of those should make it easier to find the newsgroup.
>
> >And can you remind us again, which news server do you run again?
>
> >Or have ran in the past?
>
> I know you're jealous, Bruce, because you are not the center of attention
> on this one. Grant already beat you to hijacking the proposal. Your antics,
> if any, would be too late. Feel free to create the group with a different
> name than Grant used since you just don't give a shit as you've told us
> many many times.

Timmy, you need to get out of the basement more.

> The moment the proposal was hijacked by Grant, there's nothing more to
> discuss. The morphing troll of a proponent became irrelevant, not that
> he was ever going to do anything.

A responsive news admin is now a hijacker?  Sounds like fun!