Re: Proposal - alt.comp.os.windows-11

? Good Guy ? <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> 
> 
> 
> 

No, he goes way back before then.

In 2001 he probably was already micromanagering this group (alt.config).

Him and several of his circle jerk friends would just about shoot down any
proposal made here. Like psychotics torturing ants with a magnifying glass.

Of course it always ended up being denied, none of them were news admins so
they couldn't of created the group if they wanted to. (hint hint on the
answers to the two questions).

They just liked to string people along making them jump through hoops.

And 20 years later he's still at it. No help what so ever. Just nitpicking
over rules and stupid syntax and naming conventions that aren't even real
except for in his head.

Hey folks, get this, if you want a new alt.* group created or added to your
service, just ask the news admin to add it. They'll probably be happy to do
so. If it doesn't get any traction (posts), feel free to come here and say
something like, "my news admin created alt.phony.news-admins" and we'd like
to see other systems carry it.

Likely the few real news admins reading this group will also be happy to add
it also. No fuss, no muss. No stupid discussion is needed, no complaints
about spaces instead of tabs, this or that over 78 characters, charters or
other justifications. (this offer does not apply to alt.binaries.*).

This is the way alt.* was supposed to be managed. 

If the group fails, it fails, move on to the next.

-bruce
[email protected]