Re: PROPOSAL: alt.comp.retro-computing
Troll Alert <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:00:03 -0600
| Newsgroups | alt.config |
|---|---|
| Organization | Cyber23 news |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/9/23 17:54, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > OldbieOne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For consideration: alt.comp.retro-computing > > Where is your For your newsgroups file line? > > This should probably be named into alt.comp.hardware.* if it were > justified, which it's not. > >> CHARTER: alt.comp.retro-computing is to be a place where those using vintage >> machines can share or discuss experiences relating to the use and modification >> of depricated IT technologies in the modern age. > >> The newsgroup will not be moderated. Binary, off-topic, spam and >> advertising posts are not permitted. Discussion of hacks, cracks, warez, >> serial numbers or the illegal exchange of copyrighted software to be prohibited > > What does this boilerplate have to do with anything? Who cares if serial > numbers of vintage equipment are exchanged? > > In the boilerplate, you list off topic topics, including binaries and > advertising. Don't say "spam" which is always off topic and not specific > to a newsgroup. When was the last time you saw warez on Usenet? > >> JUSTIFICATION: The retro PC community has been growing exponentially, and there >> is no group currently within the alt.* or any other main USENET hierarchy, >> which provides a forum specifically for discussing retro computing. > > You didn't look. There's an Italian language newsgroup. > > it.comp.retrocomputing > > There's always a place to discuss anything on Usenet, like > alt.comp.hardware. > > With Justification, you look for the discussion in the newsgroups in > which it's already taking place. This isn't justification. > > Why? So you know whom to promote the group to. If no discussion is > taking place, there's no audience for the newsgroup. > >> Numerous trade punlications and media sources confirm the growth and need for >> such a community. > >> For example: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/style/retrocomputing.html > >> Thank you for your consideration > > Ok. What happens in another medium of communication isn't relevant. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 👾 👿 💀 👽 👻 👺 👹 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ❗ TROLL ALERT -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ❎ TROLL DETECTED -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 💩 TYPE: KNOW-IT-ALL BUREAUCRAT TROLL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 👿 TACTIC: YOU ARE NOT RELEVANT -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ⛔ WARNING: DO NOT ENGAGE! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-