Re: PROPOSAL: alt.comp.retro-computing
[email protected] (OldbieOne) Fri, 10 Mar 2023 22:44:27 GMT
| Newsgroups | alt.config |
|---|---|
| Organization | NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:57:21 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> did make me awaken from my chaotic existentialism when they didst announce: >OldbieOne <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I didn't realize I was in the presence of such greatness! :O > >>https://groups.google.com/g/aus.hi-fi/c/ed7QqoXSLr8 > >You never were a serious proponent. I'm not explaining the history of I was, but my post was half-assed because I thought nobody even bothered. >that as you sure as hell were well aware of it. Now that much *IS* true! Yes, I've been around..... >>You're so vain, I bet you think this newsgroup's about you: > >>alt.adam-h-kerman.config > >>I've done a lot of things in my time, but I've never been a dick to so many >>people that they've created a group purely to trash me, my dude. > >Oh, there were a good half dozen revenge froups started. What's a froup? And how would one get one started? What hierarchy is that in? rec.*? Do you mean "frop"? >>Seems quite a lot of admins have chosen to include the group in their feeds >>worldwide. Must be nice to have so many friends, eh? > >>ROFLMAO! > >Ray created it. I asked him to create the others, but he hasn't. All >that's important is that I have more revenge froups than Peter J Ross. I'm sure *you* didn't ask for it to be created..... your ego is clearly too big to allow yourself to be the butt of a joke. >>As I just posted in your eponymous group, in the spirit of wishing to offer >>constructive criticism on your behavior, I would like to offer the following >>suggestion: > >>Adam, instead of telling people what they, to your mind, did "wrong", how >>about reframing the discussion like this, for example: > >What you did wrong was refuse to post on the topic, and refuse to find >the audience for the group. The proposal itself is irrelevant since >you've got your fingers in your ears, but you do need to get syntax correct >if you send the newgroup message. What I did wrong was try to be nice on my return and post a simplified proposal as a token gesture, for which I did not expect the response I received, especially as few people actually bother to post one in the first place. But whatever! I can haz snark too ;) >This is alt.*. The proponent gets to do what he wants. Have fun. Maybe >the group won't be a spamtrap. It's 2023. The vast majority of groups are now spamtraps. Active moderated groups seem to be few and far between in the other hierarchies these days, and as we both know, alt.* is its own special hellscape and always has been. -- OldbieOne [TM] The One Who Tells It Like It is! Brought to you by RetroPC using Forte Agent News Reader .99g/32