Re: PROPOSAL: alt.comp.retro-computing

OldbieOne <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:14:23 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> did
>make me awaken from my chaotic existentialism when they didst announce:
>
>>Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>OldbieOne wrote:
>>
>>>>What's a froup?
>>
>>>You've never noticed the hilarity that ensues by pretending you 
>>>accidentally hit an adjacent key on the keyboard?  zOMG! you've never 
>>>lived ...
>>
>>The OldbieOne sockpuppet isn't whom it's pretending to be, obviously.
>
>You need to revisit the definition of a sockpuppet, my dude.
>A sock puppet, in the context of online communications, is a fake identity
>created to promote someone or something....
>
>What am I promoting? And where's any evidence that I have another account?
>(which I don't. I've been using OldbieOne, albeit not continually, for decades).
>
>And let me remind you, that you were the one who replied with derision and snark
>to a genuine request for discussion..not me.

There are not requests for discussion in alt.*. We discuss proposals in
this newsgroup. It's not the same thing at all.

I gave you feedback. You didn't wanna listen. Your choice.

>But like every other interweb snowflake, you can dish it out, but can't take it
>in retrun without getting your feels hurt.
> .

You've declared victory. Again. Congratulations on your fine
achievement.

>>Yes, "froup" began as a spelling mistake that caught on.
>
>Gretchen, stop trying to make 'froup' happen! it's not going to happen.
>
>Grow the fuck up. You've had years to do so, yet have not shown any signs of
>doing so as of yet.

Still lying, I see.

"froup" has been around a lot longer than I've been on Usenet. It's
already happened.