Re: Proposing alt.security.engineering

Keith wrote:
> 
> Keith <[email protected]> posted:
> 
> > 
> > William Stickers <[email protected]> posted:
> > 
> > > Keith wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > first of all i am an amateur (that doesn't mean i'm incompetent quiz me if you 
> > > > want), but i feel like security engineering as a field should have a sub-hierarchy
> > > > 
> > > > again i have no control group perms, so would be really cool if someone could
> > > > create this :D
> > > 
> > > <https://www.reddit.com/r/securityengineering/>
> > 
> > why can't we have both spaces?
> 
> i'm just going to set this shit up myself thats the best thing about this platform
> no one can censor you because you can just run everything independently, no wonder
> it has been consistently active for like 50+ years

I don't think you quite get it. The reason there are not half a dozen 
usenetters on here explaining the pros and cons of creating this group is 
because they have moved on. Mostly everyone has, even the spammers have given 
up. You've missed the party.
Good luck with sending the newgroup cmsg. I don't know of any NSPs that allow 
them anymore.