Re: Faux alt groups

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Will Dockery  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> noel wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:58:29 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> noel  <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:47:16 -0600, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>>> On 2026-07-23 6:27 a.m., noel wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:51:29 -0600, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-22 9:44 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>> Adam W. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So is is official?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there an official alt.* list? I'm not aware of such list.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Check isc.org .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do everyone a favour binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
>>>>>>>>> their joy of child sexual molestation) and post a direct link to
>>>>>>>>> this so-called list, it certainly doesn't pop up anywhere obvious
>>>>>>>>> when I go there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a link, that's all.  You can post a link can't you>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is one, ISC only host it, they generate it daily, it is  "just
>>>>>>>> a list", no idea why some thinks its official with alt or free
>>>>>>>> hierachies, I think Russ generates it a script that likely hasn't
>>>>>>>> been touched in a decade or two, maybe from a server or control
>>>>>>>> groups over time, dunno...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://downloads.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/newsgroups
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alt.drwho is not on it, but our server has had that group since 2017
>>>>>>>> going by posts, and the handful i looked at from back then, did not
>>>>>>>> appear cross posts, someone may have created it, and may have deleted
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> dunno, we dont honour rmgroups... and I certainly wont have any group
>>>>>>>> logs from nearly 10 years ago :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it certainly  isnt in the most obvious of places thats for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> So many bogus groups coming from the alt hierarchy.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong.  there is no such thing as a bogus group in alt.*  or free.*
>>>>
>>>> anyone can create whatever group they want in alt/free, thats the ENTIRE
>>>> point of them, just because SOME news admins CHOOSE not to honor
>>>> newgroups in there ( Russ, abd I believe E-S are eg's that do not) does
>>>> not mean its a bogus group, or it doesnt exist, or is fake or is any damn
>>>> thing else your pea sized drug fucked brain conjours up. Thats just a
>>>> newsmasters personal choice to not carte blanche accept alt or free
>>>> newgroups, MOST of us DO - since thats its entire purpose and there is
>>>> usually no harm in it (except it seems to a select few peoples ego)
> 
> Inconsistent for you.
> 
>
You're consistently stupid, Binky.