Re: Faux alt groups

In article <[email protected]>,
Bruce  <[email protected]> wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote:
>> 
>> [email protected] (The Doctor) posted:
>> 
>>> /ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 2886: '\xF0'"
>while decoding/:
>>>
>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>> Will Dockery  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> noel wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:58:29 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> noel  <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:47:16 -0600, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-23 6:27 a.m., noel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:51:29 -0600, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-22 9:44 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam W. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is is official?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there an official alt.* list? I'm not aware of such list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Check isc.org .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do everyone a favour binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
>>>>>>>>>>> their joy of child sexual molestation) and post a direct link to
>>>>>>>>>>> this so-called list, it certainly doesn't pop up anywhere obvious
>>>>>>>>>>> when I go there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just a link, that's all.  You can post a link can't you>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is one, ISC only host it, they generate it daily, it is  "just
>>>>>>>>>> a list", no idea why some thinks its official with alt or free
>>>>>>>>>> hierachies, I think Russ generates it a script that likely hasn't
>>>>>>>>>> been touched in a decade or two, maybe from a server or control
>>>>>>>>>> groups over time, dunno...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://downloads.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/newsgroups
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> alt.drwho is not on it, but our server has had that group since 2017
>>>>>>>>>> going by posts, and the handful i looked at from back then, did not
>>>>>>>>>> appear cross posts, someone may have created it, and may have deleted
>>>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>>>> dunno, we dont honour rmgroups... and I certainly wont have any group
>>>>>>>>>> logs from nearly 10 years ago :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it certainly  isnt in the most obvious of places thats for sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So many bogus groups coming from the alt hierarchy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong.  there is no such thing as a bogus group in alt.*  or free.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> anyone can create whatever group they want in alt/free, thats the ENTIRE
>>>>>> point of them, just because SOME news admins CHOOSE not to honor
>>>>>> newgroups in there ( Russ, abd I believe E-S are eg's that do not) does
>>>>>> not mean its a bogus group, or it doesnt exist, or is fake or is any damn
>>>>>> thing else your pea sized drug fucked brain conjours up. Thats just a
>>>>>> newsmasters personal choice to not carte blanche accept alt or free
>>>>>> newgroups, MOST of us DO - since thats its entire purpose and there is
>>>>>> usually no harm in it (except it seems to a select few peoples ego)
>>>
>>> Inconsistent for you.
>> 
>> Probably needs a fact check.
>> 
>> I'm not a Usenet
> >
> >
>
>https://myimgs.org/image/Y9i8F2ck
>

Off you go.
-- 
Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!